Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):535-540.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2436.

Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Affiliations

Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Tanuja Prabahar et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Aim: Compare and evaluate the microleakage of different types of pit and fissure sealants, 3M ESPE Clinpro, GC Fuji Triage Capsule, and 3M ESPE Filtek Z350 XT.

Materials and methods: A total of 54 freshly extracted maxillary and mandibular premolar teeth were used and randomly divided into three groups of 18 teeth each, and the following pit and fissure sealants were used: group I-Clinpro, group II-GC Fuji Triage Capsule, and group III-Filtek Z350 XT. Samples underwent thermocycling at 5° and 55°C with a dwell time of 10 seconds for 250 cycles. The apices of the teeth were sealed with impression compound, and two coats of fingernail polish were applied and immersed in 5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and then sectioned. The sectioned specimens were then analyzed at 4× magnification under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration and were evaluated based on Williams and Winters' criteria.

Results: The data were collected for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics included mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage. Inferential statistics included the Chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the post hoc Tukey's test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval, and the results revealed that the mean difference of the sealants was GC Fuji Triage (2.1667), Clinpro (0.7778), and Filtek Z350 XT (0.1667).

Conclusion: Filtek Z350 XT exhibited the least microleakage when compared to Clinpro and GC Fuji Triage, with their mean difference statistically significant. Hence, Filtek Z350 XT can be a promising sealant and a restorative material.

How to cite this article: Prabahar T, Chowdhary N, Konkappa KN, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):535-540.

Keywords: 3M ESPE Clinpro; Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE); GC Fuji Triage capsule; Microleakage; Pit and fissure sealants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Tooth samples used in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sealants used in the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Samples with impression compound
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Tooth samples after immersion in methylene blue dye
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Prepared samples after sectioning with a diamond disc
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Score 0—no dye penetration
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Score 1—dye penetration up to one-third of fissure total height
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Score 2—dye penetration between one-third and two-thirds of fissure total height
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Score 3—dye penetration between two-thirds and total height of fissure
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Shows the amount of dye penetration scores in percentage
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Shows the mean differences of microleakage among the three groups and it revealed that the least microleakage is seen in 3M ESPE Filtek Z350 XT, followed by 3M ESPE Clinpro, and GC Fuji Triage capsule

References

    1. Sridhar LP, Moses J, Rangeeth BN, et al. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(9):ZC01–ZC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19996.8413. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bromo F, Guida A, Santoro G, et al. Pit and fissure sealants: review of literature and application technique. Minerva Stomatol. 2011;60(10):529–541. - PubMed
    1. Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi N. The use of pit and fissure sealants-a literature review. Dent J (Basel) 2017;5(4):34. doi: 10.3390/dj5040034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harsha PP, Dhruv KV. Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage of conventional fissure sealants and self-adhering flowable composites as fissure sealant in permanent teeth-an in vitro study. Int J Sci Study. 2017;5(2):36–42. doi: 10.17354/ijss/2017/211. - DOI
    1. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976;4(5):199–206. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(76)90048-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources