The effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: A systematic review
- PMID: 36866618
- DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13654
The effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) occurs in 15-20% of pregnant women living with obesity. As global obesity prevalence increases, OSA in pregnancy is concurrently increasing, yet remains under-diagnosed. The effects of treating OSA in pregnancy are under-investigated.
Aim: A systematic review was conducted to determine whether treating pregnant women with OSA using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will improve maternal or fetal outcomes, compared with no treatment or delayed treatment.
Materials and methods: Original studies in English published until May 2022 were included. Searches were conducted in Medline, PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.org. Maternal and neonatal outcome data were extracted, and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019127754).
Results: Seven trials met inclusion criteria. Use of CPAP in pregnancy appears to be well tolerated with reasonable adherence. Use of CPAP in pregnancy may be associated with both a reduction in blood pressure and pre-eclampsia. Birthweight may be increased by maternal CPAP treatment, and preterm birth may be reduced by treatment with CPAP in pregnancy.
Conclusion: Treatment of OSA with CPAP in pregnancy may reduce hypertension and, preterm birth, and may increase neonatal birthweight. However, more rigorous definitive trial evidence is required to adequately assess the indication, efficacy, and applications of CPAP treatment in pregnancy.
Keywords: CPAP; OSA; continuous positive airway pressure; obstructive sleep apnoea; pregnancy.
© 2023 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, July/August 2023.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;68(4):541-547. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13544. Epub 2023 Jul 24. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37485812 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Spicuzza L, Caruso D, Di Maria G. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and its management. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2015; 6(5): 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622315590318.
-
- Pien GW, Pack AI, Jackson N et al. Risk factors for sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy. Thorax 2014; 69(4): 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202718.
-
- Louis J, Auckley D, Miladinovic B et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with obstructive sleep apnea in obese pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120(5): 1085-1092. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826eb9d8.
-
- Pamidi S, Pinto LM, Marc I et al. Maternal sleep-disordered breathing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(1): 52 e51-52 e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.033.
-
- Ding X-X, Wu Y-L, Xu S-J et al. A systematic review and quantitative assessment of sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Sleep Breath 2014; 18(4): 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-014-0946-4.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous