Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May-Jun;29(3):369-376.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001727. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Evaluation of an Emergency Department Visit Data Mental Health Dashboard

Amy Ising  1 , Anna Waller, Leah Frerichs
Affiliations

Evaluation of an Emergency Department Visit Data Mental Health Dashboard

Amy Ising et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023 May-Jun.

Abstract

Context: Local health departments (LHDs) need timely county-level and subcounty-level data to monitor health-related trends, identify health disparities, and inform areas of highest need for interventions as part of their ongoing assessment responsibilities; yet, many health departments rely on secondary data that are not timely and cannot provide subcounty insights.

Objective: We developed and evaluated a mental health dashboard in Tableau for an LHD audience featuring statewide syndromic surveillance emergency department (ED) data in North Carolina from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT).

Design: We developed a dashboard that provides counts, crude rates, and ED visit percentages at statewide and county levels, as well as breakdowns by zip code, sex, age group, race, ethnicity, and insurance coverage for 5 mental health conditions. We evaluated the dashboards through semistructured interviews and a Web-based survey that included the standardized usability questions from the System Usability Scale.

Participants: Convenience sample of LHD public health epidemiologists, health educators, evaluators, and public health informaticians.

Results: Six semistructured interview participants successfully navigated the dashboard but identified usability issues when asked to compare county-level trends displayed in different outputs (eg, tables vs graphs). Thirty respondents answered all questions on the System Usability Scale for the dashboard, which received an above average score of 86.

Conclusions: The dashboards scored well on the System Usability Scale, but more research is needed to identify best practices in disseminating multiyear syndromic surveillance ED visit data on mental health conditions to LHDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Castrucci BC, Rhoades EK, Leider JP, Hearne S. What gets measured gets done: an assessment of local data uses and needs in large urban health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(suppl 1):S38–S48.
    1. Leider JP, Shah GH, Williams KS, Gupta A, Castrucci BC. Data, staff, and money: leadership reflections on the future of public health informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017;23(3):302–310.
    1. Comer KF, Gibson PJ, Zou J, Rosenman M, Dixon BE. Electronic health record (EHR)-based community health measures: an exploratory assessment of perceived usefulness by local health departments. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):647.
    1. Dixon BE, Lai PT, Grannis SJ. Variation in information needs and quality: implications for public health surveillance and biomedical informatics. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013;2013:670–679.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 10 Essential Public Health Services Web site. https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/essentialhe... . Updated March 18, 2021. Accessed August 17, 2021.