Comparing State-Level and Facility-Based Review to Assess Quality of Severe Maternal Morbidity Reviews
- PMID: 36867602
- DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001717
Comparing State-Level and Facility-Based Review to Assess Quality of Severe Maternal Morbidity Reviews
Abstract
Objective: To compare results from facility-level and state-level severe maternal morbidity (SMM) reviews in Illinois.
Design: We report descriptive characteristics about SMM cases and compare the results of both review processes, including the primary cause, assessment of preventability, and factors that contributed to the severity of the SMM cases.
Setting: All birthing hospitals in Illinois.
Participants: A total of 81 SMM cases were reviewed by a facility-level committee and the state-level review committee. SMM was defined as any intensive care or critical care unit admission and/or transfusion of 4 or more units of packed red blood cells from conception to 42 days postpartum.
Results: Among the cases reviewed by both committees, hemorrhage was the primary cause of morbidity, with 26 (32.1%) and 38 (46.9%) hemorrhage cases identified by the facility-level and state-level committees, respectively. Both committees identified infection/sepsis (n = 12) and preeclampsia/eclampsia (n = 12) as the next most common causes of SMM. State-level review found more cases potentially preventable (n = 29, 35.8% vs n = 18, 22.2%) and more cases not preventable but improvement in care needed (n = 31, 38.3% vs n = 27, 33.3%). State-level review found more provider and system opportunities to alter the SMM outcome and fewer patient opportunities than facility-level review.
Conclusion: State-level review found more SMM cases potentially preventable and identified more opportunities to improve care than facility-level review. State-level review has the potential to strengthen facility-level reviews by identifying opportunities to improve the review process and develop recommendations and tools to aid facility-level reviews.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have indicated that they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment in
-
Research and Professional Literature to Inform Practice, July/August 2023.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;68(4):535-540. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13546. Epub 2023 Jul 24. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37486602 No abstract available.
References
-
- Goodman D, Stampfel C, Creanga AA, et al. Revival of a core public health function: state-and urban-based maternal death review processes. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22(5):395–398.
-
- Pierre AS, Zaharatos J, Goodman D, Callaghan WM. Challenges and opportunities in identifying, reviewing, and preventing maternal deaths. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):138–142.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Kilpatrick SK, Ecker JL. Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):B17–B22.
-
- Callaghan WM, Grobman WA, Kilpatrick SJ, Main EK, D'Alton M. Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: it is time to start. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):978–981.
-
- Illinois Department of Public Health. Illinois Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Report, 2016-2017. Chicago, IL: Illinois Department of Public Health; 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
