Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Apr;24(4):347-359.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00053-0. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma after platinum-based chemotherapy (TITAN-TCC): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma after platinum-based chemotherapy (TITAN-TCC): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Marc-Oliver Grimm et al. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab is used after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Studies suggest improved outcomes for dual checkpoint inhibition with high ipilimumab doses. We aimed to examine the safety and activity of nivolumab induction and high-dose ipilimumab as an immunotherapeutic boost as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Methods: TITAN-TCC is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial done at 19 hospitals and cancer centres in Germany and Austria. Adults aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial cancer of the bladder, urethra, ureter, or renal pelvis were eligible. Patients had to have progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and up to one more second-line or third-line treatment, a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or higher, and measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. After four doses of intravenous nivolumab 240 mg induction monotherapy every 2 weeks, patients with a partial or complete response at week 8 continued maintenance nivolumab, whereas those with stable or progressive disease (non-responders) at week 8 received a boost of two or four doses of intravenous nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients who subsequently had progressive disease during nivolumab maintenance also received a boost, using this schedule. The primary endpoint was the confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate in the intention-to-treat population and had to exceed 20% for the null hypothesis to be rejected (based on the objective response rate with nivolumab monotherapy in the CheckMate-275 phase 2 trial). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03219775, and is ongoing.

Findings: Between April 8, 2019, and Feb 15, 2021, 83 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled and all received nivolumab induction treatment (intention-to-treat population). The median age of enrolled patients was 68 years (IQR 61-76), and 57 (69%) were male and 26 (31%) were female. 50 (60%) patients received at least one boost dose. A confirmed investigator-assessed objective response was recorded in 27 (33%) of 83 patients in the intention-to-treat population, including six (7%) patients who had a complete response. This objective response rate was significantly higher than the prespecified threshold of 20% or less (33% [90% CI 24-42]; p=0·0049). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were immune-mediated enterocolitis (nine [11%] patients) and diarrhoea (five [6%] patients). Two (2%) treatment-related deaths were reported, both due to immune-mediated enterocolitis.

Interpretation: Treatment with nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab boosts in early non-responders and patients who progress late significantly improved objective response rate after previous platinum-based chemotherapy compared with the rate reported with nivolumab in the CheckMate-275 trial. Our study provides evidence for the added value of high-dose ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and suggests a potential role for the combination as a rescue strategy in platinum-pretreated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests M-OG received funding for this trial and for medical writing from Bristol Myers Squibb; grants or contracts as research or institutional funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Intuitive Surgical, and Bayer Vital; personal consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, EUSA Pharma Merck Serono, Roche Pharma, Takeda, Eisai, Bayer Vital, Janssen, and Gilead; personal honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Ipsen, Merck Serono, EUSA Pharma, Janssen, and Astellas Pharma; and personal support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Merck Serono and Bristol Myers Squibb. CBG received payment for a marketing survey from Dr Rönsberg Health Marketing Intelligence and participation on an advisory board from Bayer Vital. GN received personal consulting fees from Roche; payments or honoraria for a manuscript from Ingress Health and for lectures from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Roche; support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and personal payments for advisory boards from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche. MP received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb. FR received consulting fees from Roche, Janssen, Merck, and QED Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus', manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Janssen, Merck, MSD, QED Therapeutics, and Astellas Pharma; support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Janssen and Merck; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Roche. CB received grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Cepheid, Erbe Elektromedizin, and Janssen-Cilag; consulting fees from Roche Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, and Roche Pharma. KL received payment for manuscript writing from Bristol Myers Squibb and institutional funding from Intuitive Surgical. MartS received grants or contracts as research or institutional funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Vital, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Janssen, and Sanofi; personal consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Bayer Vital, EDAP TMS, and Sanofi; personal honoraria from AstraZeneca (MedImmune), Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen, and Merck Serono; and personal support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, EDAP TMS, and Bayer. FZ received consulting fees from Apogepha Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca Germany, Bayer Vital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Healthcare Germany, Pfizer Pharma, and Roche Pharma; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas Pharma, Bayer Vital, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Healthcare Germany, Pfizer Pharma, and Sanofi-Aventis Germany; and support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Astellas Pharma, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, and Pfizer Pharma. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Publication types

Associated data