Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;10(1):e000864.
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000864.

Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE

Affiliations

Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE

Stylianos Panopoulos et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Studies show that generic cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction tools may underestimate CVR in SLE. We examined, for the first time to our knowledge, whether generic and disease-adapted CVR scores may predict subclinical atherosclerosis progression in SLE.

Methods: We included all eligible patients with SLE without a history of cardiovascular events or diabetes mellitus, who had a 3-year carotid and femoral ultrasound follow-up examination. Five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equation, Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster) and three 'SLE-adapted' CVR scores (modified Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (mSCORE), modified Framingham Risk Score (mFRS), QRESEARCH Risk Estimator V.3 (QRISK3)) were calculated at baseline. The performance of CVR scores to predict atherosclerosis progression (defined as new atherosclerotic plaque development) was tested with Brier Score (BS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), while rank correlation was tested with Harrell's c-index. Binary logistic regression was also applied to examine determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis progression.

Results: Twenty-six (21%) of 124 included patients (90% female, mean age 44.4±11.7 years) developed new atherosclerotic plaques after a mean of 39.7±3.8 months' follow-up period. Performance analysis showed that plaque progression was better predicted by the mFRS (BS 0.14, AUROC 0.80, MCC 0.22) and QRISK3 (BS 0.16, AUROC 0.75, MCC 0.25). c-Index showed no superiority for discrimination between mFRS and QRISK3. In the multivariate analysis, QRISK3 (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.30 to 13.78, p=0.016) among the CVR prediction scores and age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21, p<0.001), cumulative glucocorticoid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.010) and antiphospholipid antibodies (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 10.80, p=0.019) among disease-related CVR factors were independently associated with plaque progression.

Conclusions: Application of SLE-adapted CVR scores such as QRISK3 or mFRS, as well as monitoring for glucocorticoid exposure and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, can help to improve CVR assessment and management in SLE.

Keywords: atherosclerosis; cardiovascular diseases; systemic lupus erythematosus; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluating the performance of mFRS and QRISK3 to predict the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with SLE (discriminatory difference in area under the curve compared by c-index: 0.80 vs 0.75, p=0.37). mFRS, modified Framingham Risk Score; QRISK3: QRESARCH Risk Estimator V.3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tektonidou MG, Lewandowski LB, Hu J, et al. . Survival in adults and children with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of studies from 1950 to 2016. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:2009–16. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211663 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Souza DCC, Santo AH, Sato EI. Mortality profile related to systemic lupus erythematosus: a multiple cause-of-death analysis. J Rheumatol 2012;39:496–503. 10.3899/jrheum.110241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tektonidou MG, Wang Z, Ward MM. Brief report: trends in hospitalizations due to acute coronary syndromes and stroke in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 1996 to 2012. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:2680–5. 10.1002/art.39758 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbhaiya M, Feldman CH, Chen SK, et al. . Comparative risks of cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, and in general Medicaid recipients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020;72:1431–9. 10.1002/acr.24328 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, et al. . Age-Specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:408–15. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122 - DOI - PubMed

Substances