Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in isolated fetal growth restriction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36869857
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.6339
Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in isolated fetal growth restriction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR). This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Selected studies included those with (a) only fetuses with FGR in the absence of fetal structural anomalies and (b) negative CMA or karyotyping results. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined as causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. Eight studies with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 146 fetuses with isolated FGR, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic variant determined as potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 17 cases, resulting in a 12% (95% CI: 7%-18%) incremental performance pool of ES. The vast majority were studied before 32 weeks'gestation. In conclusion, a monogenic disorder was prenatally found in association with apparently isolated FGR in 12% of these fetuses.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):715-722. doi: 10.1002/uog.24862. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35041238
-
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Growth Restriction and Normal Karyotype: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(1):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000479506. Epub 2017 Sep 9. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018. PMID: 28889126
-
Should we offer prenatal exome sequencing for intrauterine growth restriction or short long bones? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):409-417.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.045. Epub 2022 Oct 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36209938
-
Incremental yield of exome sequencing over standard prenatal testing in structurally normal fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;65(5):552-559. doi: 10.1002/uog.29195. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39960876 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic yield with exome sequencing in prenatal severe bilateral ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Sep;5(9):101048. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101048. Epub 2023 Jun 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37311485
Cited by
-
Utility of whole exome sequencing in the evaluation of isolated fetal growth restriction in normal chromosomal microarray analysis.Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2476038. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2476038. Epub 2025 Mar 11. Ann Med. 2025. PMID: 40066675 Free PMC article.
-
Access to prenatal exome sequencing for fetal malformations: A qualitative landscape analysis in the US.Prenat Diagn. 2023 Oct;43(11):1394-1405. doi: 10.1002/pd.6444. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Prenat Diagn. 2023. PMID: 37752660 Free PMC article.
-
A Case of Mandibuloacral Dysplasia Progeroid Syndrome Presented as In Utero Growth Restriction.J Med Ultrasound. 2024 Oct 11;33(1):84-85. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_16_24. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar. J Med Ultrasound. 2024. PMID: 40206981 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing.Pediatr Res. 2025 Mar;97(4):1269-1279. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03343-9. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 38937640 Review.
-
Prenatal Features of MIRAGE Syndrome-Case Report and Review of the Literature.Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 5;11(3):310. doi: 10.3390/children11030310. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38539345 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):B2-B17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010
-
- Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):298-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22134
-
- Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):136-142 [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353631
-
- Meler E, Sisterna S, Borrell A. Genetic syndromes associated with isolated fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(4):432-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5635
-
- Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “great obstetrical syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous