Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May;43(5):596-604.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6339. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in isolated fetal growth restriction: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in isolated fetal growth restriction: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Montse Pauta et al. Prenat Diagn. 2023 May.
Free article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR). This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Selected studies included those with (a) only fetuses with FGR in the absence of fetal structural anomalies and (b) negative CMA or karyotyping results. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined as causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. Eight studies with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 146 fetuses with isolated FGR, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic variant determined as potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 17 cases, resulting in a 12% (95% CI: 7%-18%) incremental performance pool of ES. The vast majority were studied before 32 weeks'gestation. In conclusion, a monogenic disorder was prenatally found in association with apparently isolated FGR in 12% of these fetuses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):B2-B17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010
    1. Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):298-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22134
    1. Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):136-142 [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353631
    1. Meler E, Sisterna S, Borrell A. Genetic syndromes associated with isolated fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(4):432-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5635
    1. Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “great obstetrical syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009