CHARACTERISTICS AND PREDICTORS OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS WHO ARE CANDIDATES FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH OUTSIDE OF INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
- PMID: 36870069
- PMCID: PMC10125105
- DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002112
CHARACTERISTICS AND PREDICTORS OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS WHO ARE CANDIDATES FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH OUTSIDE OF INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
Abstract
Objective: To identify and describe characteristics of patients with sepsis who could be treated with minimally invasive sepsis (MIS) approach without intensive care unit (ICU) admission and to develop a prediction model to select candidates for MIS approach. Methods: A secondary analysis of the electronic database of patients with sepsis at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Candidates for the MIS approach were adults with septic shock and less than 48 hours of ICU stay, who did not require advanced respiratory support and were alive at hospital discharge. Comparison group consisted of septic shock patients with an ICU stay of more than 48 hours without advanced respiratory support at the time of ICU admission. Results: Of 1795 medical ICU admissions, 106 patients (6%) met MIS approach criteria. Predictive variables (age >65 years, oxygen flow >4 L/min, temperature <37°C, creatinine >1.6 mg/dL, lactate >3 mmol/L, white blood cells >15 × 10 9 /L, heart rate >100 beats/min, and respiration rate >25 breaths/min) selected through logistic regression were translated into an 8-point score. Model discrimination yielded the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 79% and was well fitted (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.94) and calibrated. The MIS score cutoff of 3 resulted in a model odds ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.28) and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% confidence interval, 88.69-92.92). Conclusions: This study identifies a subset of low-risk septic shock patients who can potentially be managed outside the ICU. Once validated in an independent, prospective sample our prediction model can be used to identify candidates for MIS approach.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Shock Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Society of Critical Care Medicine . Critical care statistics. Available at: https://www.sccm.org/Communications/Critical-Care-Statistics. Accessed May 22, 2022.
-
- American Hospital Association . Fast facts on U.S. hospitals. 2020. Available at: https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals. Published 2018, March 18. Accessed June 15, 2022.
-
- Society of Critical Care Medicine . United States resource availability for COVID-19. Available at: https://www.sccm.org/Blog/March-2020/United-States-Resource-Availability.... Published 2020, March 3. Accessed May 22, 2022.
-
- Wunsch H Angus DC Harrison DA, et al. . Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2787–2793, e2781-2789. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
