Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Mar;71(3):797-802.
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1669_22.

Cataract versus combined surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Affiliations
Comment

Cataract versus combined surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Aparna Rao et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG) is often associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications and failure. This study aims to compare the long-term clinical and surgical outcomes of cataract surgery alone versus combined surgery in XFG.

This was a retrospective: comparative case series.

Methods: All patients with XFG who underwent either cataract surgery alone [group 1: either phacoemulsification, PHACO/small-incision cataract surgery (SICS), n = 35] or combined surgery (group 2: phacotrabeculectomy, PHACOT or SICS + trabeculectomy, n = 46) from 2013 to 2018 by a single trained surgeon were screened and recalled for a detailed clinical examination, including Humphrey visual field analysis at 3-monthly intervals for a minimum of 3 years. Surgical success (intraocular pressure, IOP, <21 mm Hg and >6 mm Hg with (qualified success) or without medicines, complete success, survival rates, visual field changes, and need for additional procedures/medicines for IOP control were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 81 eyes of 68 patients with XFG were included in this study (groups 1-35 eyes and groups 2-46 eyes each). Both groups achieved 27-40% IOP reduction from preoperative IOP levels, P < 0.001. Surgical success rates were similar in both groups (complete success 66% vs 55%, P = 0.4), qualified success 17% vs 24%, P = 0.8, in groups 1 and 2). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a marginally better survival rate for group 1, 75% (55-87%), than group 2, 66% (50-78%), at 3 and 5 years which was not significantly different. The number of eyes that progressed at 5 years after surgery (5-6%) was similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Cataract surgery can be as effective as combined surgery in XFG eyes with regards to final visual acuity, long-term IOP profile, and visual field progression, and complications/survival rates are comparable between the two procedures.

Keywords: Complications in pseudoexfoliation; phacotrabeculectomy; pseudoexfoliation glaucoma; small-incision cataract surgery; surgical success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative photographs showing the surgical steps of phaco-trabeculectomy. (a) A fornix-based conjunctival flap is made and a partial thickness triangular scleral flap (3 × 3 mm) is created, (b) diffuse and posterior application of MMC (0.2 mg/ml, for 3 min), (c) phacoemulsification by the phaco-chop technique, (d) foldable IOL implantation, (e) creation of trabeculectomy ostium (1.5 mm × 1.5 mm), (f) peripheral basal iridectomy, (g) closing scleral flap, and (h) the conjunctival closure by wing sutures (i) ensuring diffuse bleb formation
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plot of intraocular pressure after cataract (group 1) or combined (group 2) surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma—see text for the detailed description of groups
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma after cataract (group 1) or combined (group 2) surgery—See text for the detailed description of groups

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–90. - PubMed
    1. Thomas R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnaiah S. Pseudoexfoliation in southern India:The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1170–6. - PubMed
    1. Anastasopoulos E, Founti P, Topouzis F. Update on pseudoexfoliation syndrome pathogenesis and associations with intraocular pressure, glaucoma and systemic diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:82–9. - PubMed
    1. Shingleton BJ, Crandall AS, Ahmed II. Pseudoexfoliation and the cataract surgeon:Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues related to intraocular pressure, cataract, and intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1101–20. - PubMed
    1. Drolsum L, Ringvold A, Nicolaissen B. Cataract and glaucoma surgery in pseudoexfoliation syndrome:A review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:810–21. - PubMed