Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 14:6:976887.
doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.976887. eCollection 2023.

Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach

Anton Sigfrids  1 , Jaana Leikas  1 , Henrikki Salo-Pöntinen  2 , Emmi Koskimies  3
Affiliations

Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach

Anton Sigfrids et al. Front Artif Intell. .

Abstract

Human-centricity is considered a central aspect in the development and governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Various strategies and guidelines highlight the concept as a key goal. However, we argue that current uses of Human-Centered AI (HCAI) in policy documents and AI strategies risk downplaying promises of creating desirable, emancipatory technology that promotes human wellbeing and the common good. Firstly, HCAI, as it appears in policy discourses, is the result of aiming to adapt the concept of human-centered design (HCD) to the public governance context of AI but without proper reflection on how it should be reformed to suit the new task environment. Second, the concept is mainly used in reference to realizing human and fundamental rights, which are necessary, but not sufficient for technological emancipation. Third, the concept is used ambiguously in policy and strategy discourses, making it unclear how it should be operationalized in governance practices. This article explores means and approaches for using the HCAI approach for technological emancipation in the context of public AI governance. We propose that the potential for emancipatory technology development rests on expanding the traditional user-centered view of technology design to involve community- and society-centered perspectives in public governance. Developing public AI governance in this way relies on enabling inclusive governance modalities that enhance the social sustainability of AI deployment. We discuss mutual trust, transparency, communication, and civic tech as key prerequisites for socially sustainable and human-centered public AI governance. Finally, the article introduces a systemic approach to ethically and socially sustainable, human-centered AI development and deployment.

Keywords: AI for the common good; artificial intelligence; collaboration; ethics; governance; human-centered; social sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A systemic approach to human-centered AI development and deployment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. AI HLEG (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, European Commission. Last Modified. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-tru... (accessed November 17, 2022).
    1. Arana-Catania M., Lier F. A. V., Procter R., Tkachenko N., He Y., Zubiaga A., et al. . (2021). Citizen participation and machine learning for a better democracy. Digital Gov. Res. Prac. 2, 1–22. 10.1145/3452118 - DOI
    1. Auernhammer J. (2020). “Human-centered AI: The role of Human-centered Design Research in the development of AI,” in Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020, eds S. Boess, M. Cheung, and R. Cain. 10.21606/drs.2020.282 - DOI
    1. Babic B., Chen D. L., Evgeniou T., Fayard A. L. (2021). Onboarding AI. Harvard Bus. Rev. 98, 56–65. Available online at: http://tse-fr.eu/pub/125394
    1. Bannon L. (2011). Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions 18, 50–57. 10.1145/1978822.1978833 - DOI