Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 16:10:1040528.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1040528. eCollection 2023.

Developing a novel tool to assess the ability to self-administer medication - A systematic evaluation of patients' video recordings in the ABLYMED study

Affiliations

Developing a novel tool to assess the ability to self-administer medication - A systematic evaluation of patients' video recordings in the ABLYMED study

Anneke Luegering et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Older people often experience medication management problems due to multimorbidity, polypharmacy and medication complexity. There is often a large gap between patients’ self-reported and actual abilities to handle the self-administration of their medication. Here we report on the development and evaluation of a new tool to assess the ability of non-demented hospitalized patients to self-administer medication in different dosage forms. To this end, we video-recorded the patients’ medication management performance and implemented a novel assessment scheme, which was applied by several independent raters.

Methods: Sixty-seven in-patients ≥70 years of age and regularly taking ≥5 different drugs autonomously of the ABLYMED study agreed to the video recording of their medication management performance with five different dosage forms. All raters underwent a training and applied a standardized assessment form and written guide with rating rules for evaluation. In a pilot phase, video recordings of three patients were rated by 19 raters (15 medical students, two expert raters to determine a reference standard, and two main raters who later rated the total sample). In the rating phase, based on the ratings obtained from the two main raters, we determined interrater (assessed every section of 20 patients as agreement between the raters at one point of time) and intrarater (assessed as consistency within each rater across three points of time) agreement by intraclass correlation analysis.

Results: In the pilot phase we obtained an overall sufficient agreement pattern, with an adjustment of the rating rules for patches. In the rating phase we achieved satisfactory agreement between the two raters (interrater reliability) and across different points of time (intrarater reliability). For two dosage forms (eye-drops and pen), rater training needed to be repeated to reach satisfactory levels.

Discussion: Our novel rating procedure was found to be objective, valid and reproducible, given appropriate training of the raters. Our findings are an important part of a larger research project to implement a novel assessment for the ability to self-administer medication in different dosage forms. Further, they can support the development of patient trainings to improve medication management and secure independent living.

Keywords: aged; medication management problems; rating procedure; self administration; self-reported ability; video recordings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer BB declared a past co-authorship with the author(s) TD, DH to the handling editor.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Accuracy is the proximity of assessments to the true value; precision is the degree to which repeated assessments under unchanged conditions show the same results. An ideal assessment should be accurate and precise (upper part Pekaje, creative common license wikimedia, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Accuracy_and_precision.svg, downloaded 25th July, 2022).

References

    1. Beckman AG, Parker MG, Thorslund M. Can elderly people take their medicine? Patient Educ Couns. (2005) 59:186–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA. A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. (2011) 9:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.02.004, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. (2014) 13:57–65. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.827660, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schenk A, Eckardt-Felmberg R, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Stegemann S. Patient behaviour in medication management: findings from a patient usability study that may impact clinical outcomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2020) 86:1958–68. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13946, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shippee ND, Shah ND, May CR, Mair FS, Montori VM. Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol. (2012) 65:1041–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources