Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis
- PMID: 36874864
- PMCID: PMC9978378
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093290
Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: a conceptual analysis.Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 20;14:1345256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345256. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38444880 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The neurodiversity paradigm challenges pathologising accounts of neurodevelopmental differences, including autism, attention deficit disorder (ADHD), dyslexia, developmental language disorder (DLD) and others. From a neurodiversity perspective, these differences in the way people perceive, learn about and interact with the world are conceptualised as naturally occurring cognitive variation, akin to biodiversity in the natural environment, which may bring unique strengths and challenges for individuals. An implication of this approach is that interventions designed to create contexts in which neurodivergent people can thrive are needed, in addition to those that seek to ameliorate individual-level difficulties. In this conceptual review, we consider how higher education can offer a context in which cognitive diversity can be noticed, welcomed and accepted with warmth. In universities, neurodiversity is one dimension of difference within an increasingly diverse student population, which overlaps - but is not synonymous - with disability. We argue that improving experience and outcomes for neurodivergent students should be a priority for universities aiming to produce graduates equipped to tackle the complex problems of contemporary society. Drawing on the foundational principles of compassion-focused psychological therapies, we consider how compassion can be enacted within interpersonal interaction, curriculum design, and leadership culture in universities. We apply the insights of double empathy theory to the problem of overcoming barriers of difference in the classroom. Finally, we make recommendations for Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and strengths-based pedagogical approaches, which create a fit-for-purpose educational environment for the widest possible range of learners. This realignment with the neurodiversity paradigm offers an antidote to bolt-on provisions for students who differ from the neuro-normative, and might enable neurodivergent thinkers to flourish within and beyond higher education.
Keywords: Universal Design for Learning; compassion; double empathy; higher education; neurodiversity.
Copyright © 2023 Hamilton and Petty.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
-
- Allen M., Coney K. (2019). What happens next? 2019: a report on the first destinations of 2016/17 disabled graduates. The Associate of Graduate Careers Advisory Services. Available at: https://www.agcas.org.uk/Latest/launch-of-what-happens-next-2019
-
- Anderson A. H., Stephenson J., Carter M. (2017). A systematic literature review of the experiences and supports of students with autism spectrum disorder in post-secondary education. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 39, 33–53. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2017.04.002 - DOI
-
- Bakker T., Krabbendam L., Bhulai S., Begeer S. (2019). Background and enrollment characteristics of students with autism in higher education. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 67:101424. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101424 - DOI
-
- Bayeh R. (2022). Neurodiversity, Intersectionality and Distress: A Quantitative Survey on the Experiences of University Students. MA thesis. Montreal: Concordia University.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
