Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Feb 15:11:1070581.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070581. eCollection 2023.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Xiaojing Wu et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Immunocompromised patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) warrant special attention because they comprise a growing proportion of patients and tend to have poor clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with SCAP, and to investigate the risk factors for mortality in these patients.

Methods: We conducted retrospective observational cohort study of patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic tertiary hospital with SCAP between January 2017 and December 2019 and compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients.

Results: Among the 393 patients, 119 (30.3%) were immunocompromised. Corticosteroid (51.2%) and immunosuppressive drug (23.5%) therapies were the most common causes. Compared to immunocompetent patients, immunocompromised patients had a higher frequency of polymicrobial infection (56.6 vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001), early mortality (within 7 days) (26.1 vs. 13.1%, P = 0.002), and ICU mortality (49.6 vs. 37.6%, P = 0.027). The pathogen distributions differed between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Among immunocompromised patients, Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus were the most common pathogens. Immunocompromised status (OR: 2.043, 95% CI: 1.114-3.748, P = 0.021) was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. Independent risk factors for ICU mortality in immunocompromised patients included age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 9.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.472-56.234, P = 0.018), SOFA score [OR: 1.338, 95% CI: 1.048-1.708, P = 0.019), lymphocyte count < 0.8 × 109/L (OR: 6.640, 95% CI: 1.463-30.141, P = 0.014), D-dimer level (OR: 1.160, 95% CI: 1.013-1.329, P = 0.032), FiO2 > 0.7 (OR: 10.228, 95% CI: 1.992-52.531, P = 0.005), and lactate level (OR: 4.849, 95% CI: 1.701-13.825, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Immunocompromised patients with SCAP have distinct clinical characteristics and risk factors that should be considered in their clinical evaluation and management.

Keywords: clinical characteristics; community-acquired pneumonia; immunocompromised status; intensive care unit; risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top 10 pathogens of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. (A) immunocompromised patients; (B) immunocompetent patients. The length of the colored bars and numbers behind them indicate the proportion of each pathogen, calculated using their positive number as the numerator and the number of patients with positive pathogen results as the denominator.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haessler S, Guo N, Deshpande A, Zilberberg MD, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK, et al. . Etiology, treatments, and outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia in a large U.S. sample. Crit Care Med. (2022) 50:1063–71. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005498 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nair GB, Niederman MS. Updates on community acquired pneumonia management in the ICU. Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 217:107663. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107663 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torres A, Chalmers JD, Dela Cruz CS, Dominedo C, Kollef M, Martin-Loeches I, et al. . Challenges in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a point-of-view review. Intensive Care Med. (2019) 45:159–71. 10.1007/s00134-019-05519-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Pasquale MF, Sotgiu G, Gramegna A, Radovanovic D, Terraneo S, Reyes LF, et al. . Prevalence and etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. (2019) 68:1482–93. 10.1093/cid/ciy723 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sousa D, Justo I, Dominguez A, Manzur A, Izquierdo C, Ruiz L, et al. . Community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised older patients: incidence, causative organisms and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2013) 19:187–92. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03765.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types