Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 3;26(3):106129.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106129. eCollection 2023 Mar 17.

Acceptance of meat reduction policies in Switzerland

Affiliations

Acceptance of meat reduction policies in Switzerland

Sebastian Richter et al. iScience. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptance of different policy measures affecting meat consumption in Switzerland. We conducted qualitative interviews with leading stakeholders and elaborated 37 policy measures for reducing meat consumption. In a standardized survey, we analyzed the acceptance of these measures and important preconditions for their implementation. Measures with potentially the biggest direct leverage, such as a VAT increase on meat products, were highly rejected. We found high levels of acceptance for measures that do not directly affect meat consumption but have the potential for significant changes of meat consumption in the longer run - such as research investment and sustainable diet education. Furthermore, some measures with considerable short-term effects were widely accepted (e.g., stricter animal welfare standards, ban of meat advertisements). These measures could be a promising starting point for policy makers aiming at a transformation of the food system toward lower levels of meat consumption.

Keywords: Consumer research in food market; Food marketing; Global change; Natural resources; Research methodology social sciences; Sustainability aspects of food production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual and contextual factors influencing opinion formation and (degree of) acceptance of the SH-organizations; source: own illustration based on Schade and Schlag and Pleger
Figure 2
Figure 2
Acceptance of the 37 meat reduction measures The numbers in the above figure represent the number of individual SHs that rejected the measure (orange), stated “don’t know” (gray), conditionally approved (light blue) or approved (dark blue) the measure. See also Figure S2 and Table S6.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Acceptance by measure and organization type The numbers in the above figure represent the average percentage of SHs of the respective organization type that rejected (orange), stated “don’t know” (gray), conditionally approved (light blue) or approved (dark blue) the measures from the respective measure type. See also Figure S2.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Godfray H.C.J., Aveyard P., Garnett T., Hall J.W., Key T.J., Lorimer J., Pierrehumbert R.T., Scarborough P., Springmann M., Jebb S.A. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018;361:eaam5324. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Springmann M., Clark M., Mason-D’Croz D., Wiebe K., Bodirsky B.L., Lassaletta L., De Vries W., Vermeulen S.J., Herrero M., Carlson K.M., et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562:519–525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stolze M., Schader C., Muller A., Frehner A., Kopainsky B., Nathani C., Brandes J., Rohrmann S., Brombach C., Krieger J.-P. FiBL; 2019. Sustainable and Healthy Diets: Trade-Offs and Synergies: Final Scientific Report.
    1. Bonnet C., Bouamra-Mechemache Z., Réquillart V., Treich N. Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Pol. 2020;97:101847. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101847. - DOI
    1. Ivanova D., Barrett J., Wiedenhofer D., Macura B., Callaghan M., Creutzig F. Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15:093001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources