Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;94(2):756-761.
doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02533-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

Trends in fetal and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alabama

Affiliations

Trends in fetal and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alabama

Vivek V Shukla et al. Pediatr Res. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The current study evaluated the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with higher stillbirth but lower neonatal mortality rates.

Methods: We compared three epochs: baseline (2016-2019, January-December, weeks 1-52, and 2020, January-February, weeks 1-8), initial pandemic (2020, March-December, weeks 9-52, and 2021, January-June, weeks 1-26), and delta pandemic (2021, July-September, weeks 27-39) periods, using Alabama Department of Public Health database including deliveries with stillbirths ≥20 weeks or live births ≥22 weeks gestation. The primary outcomes were stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates.

Results: A total of 325,036 deliveries were included (236,481 from baseline, 74,076 from initial pandemic, and 14,479 from delta pandemic period). The neonatal mortality rate was lower in the pandemic periods (4.4 to 3.5 and 3.6/1000 live births, in the baseline, initial, and delta pandemic periods, respectively, p < 0.01), but the stillbirth rate did not differ (9 to 8.5 and 8.6/1000 births, p = 0.41). On interrupted time-series analyses, there were no significant changes in either stillbirth (p = 0.11 for baseline vs. initial pandemic period, and p = 0.67 for baseline vs. delta pandemic period) or neonatal mortality rates (p = 0.28 and 0.89, respectively).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic periods were not associated with a significant change in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates compared to the baseline period.

Impact: The COVID-19 pandemic could have resulted in changes in fetal and neonatal outcomes. However, only a few population-based studies have compared the risk of fetal and neonatal mortality in the pandemic period to the baseline period. This population-based study identifies the changes in fetal and neonatal outcomes during the initial and delta COVID-19 pandemic period as compared to the baseline period. The current study shows that stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates were not significantly different in the initial and delta COVID-19 pandemic periods as compared to the baseline period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

W.A.C. is on the board of directors of MEDNAX Services, Inc. All other authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality by period and total new COVID-19 cases in Alabama.
The COVID-19 pandemic periods were not associated with significant change in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates compared to the baseline period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Percent change in stillbirth and neonatal mortality by social distancing index during the pandemic compared to the baseline period.
The social distancing index was not significantly cross-correlated with the percent change of stillbirths (coefficient = 0.12, 95% CI = −0.32 to 0.51, p = 0.60) and neonatal mortality (coefficient = −0.09, 95% CI = −0.50 to 0.34, p = 0.69).

References

    1. White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;323:1773–1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, Collins SR. Covid-19 - implications for the health care system. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1483–1488. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2021088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy - ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1873–1875. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartnett KP, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2020;69:699–704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lange SJ, et al. Potential indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on use of emergency departments for acute life-threatening conditions - United States, January-May 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2020;69:795–800. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types