Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;49(6):2347-2354.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02254-4. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

The statistical fragility of intramedullary reaming in tibial nail fixation: a systematic review

Arjun Minhas  1   2 , Fehmi Berkay  3 , Cooper B Ehlers  4 , Andrew W Froehle  3 , Anil B Krishnamurthy  3
Affiliations

The statistical fragility of intramedullary reaming in tibial nail fixation: a systematic review

Arjun Minhas et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To report the statistical stability of prospective clinical trials evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on rates of non-union in tibial fractures through calculation of the fragility metrics for non-union rates and all other dichotomous outcomes.

Methods: Literature search was conducted for prospective clinical trials evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on non-union rates in tibial nailing. All dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the manuscripts. The fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated by determining the number of event reversals required for a statistically significant outcome to lose significance and vice-versa. The fragility quotient (FQ) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) were calculated by dividing the FI or RFI by the sample size, respectively. Outcomes were defined as "fragile" if the FI or RFI was found to be less than or equal to the number of patients lost to follow-up.

Results: Literature search identified 579 results which produced ten studies meeting the criteria for review. There were 111 outcomes identified for analysis, of which 89 (80%) exhibited statistical fragility. For reported outcomes across the studies the median and mean FI was 2, the median FQ was 0.019, the mean FQ was 0.030, the median RFI was 4, the mean RFI was 3.95, the median RFQ was 0.045, and the mean RFQ was 0.030. Four studies reported outcomes which were found to have an FI of 0.

Conclusions: The studies evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on tibial nail fixation demonstrate considerable fragility. On average, two event reversals for significant findings, and four event reversals for insignificant findings are sufficient to alter statistical significance.

Level of evidence: Level II, systematic review of Level I and Level II studies.

Keywords: Fragility index; Fragility quotient; Intramedullary reaming; Non-union; Tibia fracture; Tibial nail.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial-Focus on tibia shaft fractures.
    Mittlmeier T. Mittlmeier T. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2327-2328. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02402-w. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38055042 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Miller NC, Askew AE. Tibia fractures. an overview of evaluation and treatment. Orthop Nurs. 2007;26(4):216–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NOR.0000284648.52968.27 (quiz 224–5).
    1. Schmidt AH, Finkemeier CG, Tornetta P 3rd. Treatment of closed tibial fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:607–22. - PubMed
    1. Gregory P, Sanders R. The treatment of closed, unstable tibial shaft fractures with unreamed interlocking nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:48–55.
    1. Abdullah L, Davis DE, Fabricant PD, et al. Is there truly “no significant difference”? Underpowered randomized controlled trials in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2015;97(24):2068–73. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00012 . - DOI
    1. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124.1. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources