Biases in bioethics: a narrative review
- PMID: 36879251
- PMCID: PMC9990212
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0
Biases in bioethics: a narrative review
Abstract
Given that biases can distort bioethics work, it has received surprisingly little and fragmented attention compared to in other fields of research. This article provides an overview of potentially relevant biases in bioethics, such as cognitive biases, affective biases, imperatives, and moral biases. Special attention is given to moral biases, which are discussed in terms of (1) Framings, (2) Moral theory bias, (3) Analysis bias, (4) Argumentation bias, and (5) Decision bias. While the overview is not exhaustive and the taxonomy by no means is absolute, it provides initial guidance with respect to assessing the relevance of various biases for specific kinds of bioethics work. One reason why we should identify and address biases in bioethics is that it can help us assess and improve the quality of bioethics work.
Keywords: Affective; Bias; Cognitive; Distortion; Ethics; Imperative; Judgment; Quality.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
I certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript, and there are no financial arrangements or arrangements with respect to the content of this comment with any companies or organizations. Conflict of interests is none.
Similar articles
-
From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics.Bioethics. 2018 Feb;32(2):119-125. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12419. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Bioethics. 2018. PMID: 29280167
-
A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):201-31. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0017. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998. PMID: 11656932
-
A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):233-73. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0018. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998. PMID: 11656933
-
The principlism debate: a critical overview.J Med Philos. 1995 Feb;20(1):85-105. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.1.85. J Med Philos. 1995. PMID: 7738461 Review.
-
Between Relativism and Imperialism: Navigating Moral Diversity in Cross-Cultural Bioethics.Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Dec;15(3):162-71. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12059. Epub 2014 Apr 21. Dev World Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 24750579 Review.
Cited by
-
Cognitive biases and moral characteristics of healthcare workers and their treatment approach for persons with advanced dementia in acute care settings.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 22;10:1145142. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1145142. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37425320 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating cognitive bias in clinical ethics supports: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 30;26(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01162-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2025. PMID: 39885477 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01112-1. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39415204 Free PMC article.
-
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9. Med Health Care Philos. 2024. PMID: 39120780 Free PMC article.
-
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40564530 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Toet A, Brouwer A-M, van den Bosch K, Korteling J. Effects of personal characteristics on susceptibility to decision bias: a literature study. Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2016;5:1–17.
-
- Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, Eng E, Day SH, Coyne-Beasley T. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):e60–e76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Banuri S, Dercon S, Gauri V. Biased policy professionals. World Bank Econ Rev. 2019;33(2):310–327. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhy033. - DOI
-
- Chapman GB. Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making. In: Chapman G, Sonnenberg F, editors. Decision making in health care: Theory, psychology, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 183–210.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources