Reactivation of herpesviruses during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36880642
- DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2437
Reactivation of herpesviruses during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
To provide a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the cumulative incidence (incidence proportion) of human herpesvirus (HHV) reactivation among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE up to 25 September 2022, with no language restrictions. All interventional and observational studies enrolling patients with confirmed COVID-19 and providing data regarding HHV reactivation were included. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analyses. We included information from 32 studies. HHV reactivation was considered a positive polymerase chain reaction result taken at the time of COVID-19 infection. Most of the included patients were severe COVID-19 cases. The pooled cumulative incidence estimate was 38% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI], 28%-50%, I2 = 86%) for herpes simplex virus (HSV), 19% (95% CI, 13%-28%, I2 = 87%) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), 45% (95% CI, 28%-63%, I2 = 96%) for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 18% (95% CI, 8%-35%) for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), 44% (95% CI, 32%-56%) for human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7), and 19% (95% CI, 14%-26%) for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). There was no evidence of funnel plot asymmetry based on visual inspection and Egger's regression test for the results of HSV (p = 0.84), CMV (p = 0.82), and EBV (p = 0.27) reactivation. In conclusion, the identification of HHV reactivation in severe COVID-19 patients is helpful in the management of patients as well as the prevention of complications. Further research is required to elucidate the interaction between HHVs and COVID-19. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022321973.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; human herpesviruses.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Zhang J, Litvinova M, Wang W, et al. Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):793-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30230-9
-
- Moss P. “The ancient and the new”: is there an interaction between cytomegalovirus and SARS-CoV-2 infection? Immun Ageing. 2020;17(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-020-00185-x
-
- Chen T, Song J, Liu H, Zheng H, Chen C. Positive Epstein-Barr virus detection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90351-y
-
- Shafiee A, Teymouri Athar MM, Nassar M, et al. Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metabol Syndr. 2022;16(6):102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102512
-
- Virgin Herbert W. The Virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell. 2014;157(1):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.032
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
