Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May;33(3):e2437.
doi: 10.1002/rmv.2437. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

Reactivation of herpesviruses during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Reactivation of herpesviruses during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arman Shafiee et al. Rev Med Virol. 2023 May.

Abstract

To provide a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the cumulative incidence (incidence proportion) of human herpesvirus (HHV) reactivation among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE up to 25 September 2022, with no language restrictions. All interventional and observational studies enrolling patients with confirmed COVID-19 and providing data regarding HHV reactivation were included. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analyses. We included information from 32 studies. HHV reactivation was considered a positive polymerase chain reaction result taken at the time of COVID-19 infection. Most of the included patients were severe COVID-19 cases. The pooled cumulative incidence estimate was 38% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI], 28%-50%, I2 = 86%) for herpes simplex virus (HSV), 19% (95% CI, 13%-28%, I2 = 87%) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), 45% (95% CI, 28%-63%, I2 = 96%) for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 18% (95% CI, 8%-35%) for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), 44% (95% CI, 32%-56%) for human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7), and 19% (95% CI, 14%-26%) for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). There was no evidence of funnel plot asymmetry based on visual inspection and Egger's regression test for the results of HSV (p = 0.84), CMV (p = 0.82), and EBV (p = 0.27) reactivation. In conclusion, the identification of HHV reactivation in severe COVID-19 patients is helpful in the management of patients as well as the prevention of complications. Further research is required to elucidate the interaction between HHVs and COVID-19. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022321973.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; human herpesviruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Zhang J, Litvinova M, Wang W, et al. Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):793-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30230-9
    1. Moss P. “The ancient and the new”: is there an interaction between cytomegalovirus and SARS-CoV-2 infection? Immun Ageing. 2020;17(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-020-00185-x
    1. Chen T, Song J, Liu H, Zheng H, Chen C. Positive Epstein-Barr virus detection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90351-y
    1. Shafiee A, Teymouri Athar MM, Nassar M, et al. Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metabol Syndr. 2022;16(6):102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102512
    1. Virgin Herbert W. The Virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell. 2014;157(1):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.032

MeSH terms