Long-term patient-focussed outcomes remain under-evaluated in reviews of pyloric drainage procedures in oesophagectomy
- PMID: 36881164
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02847-y
Long-term patient-focussed outcomes remain under-evaluated in reviews of pyloric drainage procedures in oesophagectomy
Comment on
-
Are intra-operative gastric drainage procedures necessary in esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3287-3295. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02685-4. Epub 2022 Sep 26. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 36163378
References
-
- Nevins EJ, Maleyko I, Brown ST, Nazeer MN, Sangheli A, Phillips AW (2022) Are intra-operative gastric drainage procedures necessary in esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(8):3287–3295 - PubMed
-
- Junttila A, Helminen O, Helmiö Mika, Huhta H, Kallio R, Koivukangas V et al (2022) Five-year survival after McKeown compared to Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005437
-
- Slaman AE, Pirozzolo G, Eshuis WJ, Bergman JJGHM, Hulshof MCCM, van Laarhoven HWM, et al (2022) Improved clinical and survival outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer over 25 years. Ann Thorac Surg 114(4):1118–1126
-
- Benedix F, Willems T, Kropf S, Schubert D, Stübs P, Wolff S (2017) Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(3):547–554 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources