Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET
- PMID: 36881421
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.11.015
Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend verification of myocardial ischemia by selective second-line myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) following a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Head-to-head data on the diagnostic performance of different MPI modalities in this setting are sparse.
Objectives: The authors sought to compare, head-to-head, the diagnostic performance of selective MPI by 3.0-T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 82rubidium positron emission tomography (RbPET) in patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference.
Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 1,732, mean age: 59.1 ± 9.5 years, 57.2% men) referred for coronary CTA with symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD were included. Patients with suspected stenosis were referred for both CMR and RbPET and subsequently ICA. Obstructive CAD was defined as FFR ≤0.80 or >90% diameter stenosis by visual assessment.
Results: In total, 445 patients had suspected stenosis on coronary CTA. Of these, 372 patients completed both CMR, RbPET and subsequent ICA with FFR. Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was identified in 164 of 372 (44.1%) patients. Sensitivities for CMR and RbPET were 59% (95% CI: 51%-67%) and 64% (95% CI: 56%-71%); P = 0.21, respectively, and specificities 84% (95% CI: 78%-89%) and 89% (95% CI: 84%-93%]); P = 0.08, respectively. Overall accuracy was higher for RbPET compared with CMR (73% vs 78%; P = 0.03).
Conclusions: In patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA, CMR, and RbPET show similar and moderate sensitivities but high specificities compared with ICA with FFR. This patient group represents a diagnostic challenge with frequent mismatch between advanced MPI tests and invasive measurements. (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 [Dan-NICAD 2]; NCT03481712).
Keywords: cardiac magnetic resonance; chronic coronary syndrome; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; myocardial perfusion imaging; positron emission tomography.
Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was supported by the Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region, Aarhus University Research Foundation, and by an institutional research grant from Acarix A/S, Denmark. Dr Winther has received support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Clinical Emerging Investigator grant (NNF21OC0066981). Dr Benovoy is an employee and shareholder of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Dr Petersen has served as a consultant to and is stockowner of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Dr Böttcher has participated in advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, Novartis, AMGEN, CLS-Behring, and Acarix. All other authors have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress CMR vs PET Following Coronary CTA.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 May;16(5):656-658. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Mar 8. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36898937 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous