A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health
- PMID: 36882020
- DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13949
A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health
Abstract
Objective: To investigate sidestream dark field (SDF) videomicroscopy as an objective measure of intestinal viability and determine the effects of enterectomy techniques on intestinal microvasculature in dogs with foreign body obstructions.
Study design: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.
Animals: A total of 24 dogs with an intestinal foreign body obstruction and 30 systemically healthy dogs.
Methods: An SDF videomicroscope imaged the microvasculature at the site of the foreign body. Subjectively viable intestine received an enterotomy whereas nonviable intestine received an enterectomy using a handsewn (4-0 polydioxanone, simple continuous) or a functional end-to-end stapled technique (GIA 60 blue, TA 60 green) was used on an alternating basis. The microvasculature adjacent to the enterectomy was interrogated. Quantitative measures of microvascular health were calculated for each site and compared with healthy dogs.
Results: Microvascular density (mean ± SD) at the site of obstruction (140.84 ± 77.40) was lower than healthy controls (251.72 ± 97.10, p < .01). There was no difference in microvascular parameters (density or perfused boundary region, PBR) between obstructed dogs with subjectively viable and nonviable intestine (p > .14). The density (p = .66) and PBR of microvessels (p = .76) adjacent to the sutured enterectomy or TA green staple line did not differ.
Conclusion: Sidestream dark field videomicroscopy can identify obstructed intestine and quantitate the severity of microvascular compromise. Handsewn and stapled enterectomies equally preserve perfusion.
Clinical significance: Stapled enterectomies do not lead to greater vascular compromise than handsewn enterectomies.
© 2023 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Risk Factors for Dehiscence of Stapled Functional End-to-End Intestinal Anastomoses in Dogs: 53 Cases (2001-2012).Vet Surg. 2016 Jan;45(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12413. Epub 2015 Nov 13. Vet Surg. 2016. PMID: 26565990 Free PMC article.
-
Intestinal incisional dehiscence rate following enterotomy for foreign body removal in 247 dogs.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019 Sep 15;255(6):695-699. doi: 10.2460/javma.255.6.695. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31478820
-
The Pathophysiology of Small Intestinal Foreign Body Obstruction and Intraoperative Assessment of Tissue Viability in Dogs: A Review.Top Companion Anim Med. 2020 Aug;40:100438. doi: 10.1016/j.tcam.2020.100438. Epub 2020 May 16. Top Companion Anim Med. 2020. PMID: 32690289 Review.
-
Retrospective evaluation of gastrointestinal foreign bodies and presurgical predictors for enterectomy versus enterotomy in dogs (2013-2016): 82 cases.J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2022 Jan;32(1):98-105. doi: 10.1111/vec.13139. Epub 2021 Sep 23. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2022. PMID: 34555866
-
A Review of Normal Intestinal Healing, Intestinal Anastomosis, and the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Intestinal Dehiscence in Foreign Body Obstructions in Dogs.Top Companion Anim Med. 2020 Nov;41:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.tcam.2020.100457. Epub 2020 Jun 20. Top Companion Anim Med. 2020. PMID: 32823156 Review.
Cited by
-
Real-time ancillary diagnostics for intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability in horses-looking for answers across species.Vet Surg. 2025 May;54(4):648-664. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14248. Epub 2025 Mar 20. Vet Surg. 2025. PMID: 40114354 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allen DA, Smeak DD, Schertel ER. Prevalence of small intestinal dehiscence and associated clinical factors: a retrospective study of 121 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1992;28:70-76.
-
- Ralphs SC, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Risk factors for leakage following intestinal anastomosis in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223:73-77.
-
- Duell JR, Thieman Mankin KM, Rochat MC. Frequency of dehiscence in hand-sutured and stapled intestinal anastomoses in dogs. Vet Surg. 2016;45:100-103.
-
- Snowdon KA, Smeak DD, Chiang S. Risk factors for dehiscence of stapled functional end-to-end intestinal anastomoses in dogs: 53 cases (2001-2012). Vet Surg. 2016;45:91-99.
-
- DePompeo CM, Bond L, George YE, et al. Intra-abdominal complications following intestinal anastomoses by suture and staple techniques in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:437-443.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical