A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health
- PMID: 36882020
- DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13949
A quantitative evaluation of the effect of foreign body obstruction and enterectomy technique on canine small intestinal microvascular health
Abstract
Objective: To investigate sidestream dark field (SDF) videomicroscopy as an objective measure of intestinal viability and determine the effects of enterectomy techniques on intestinal microvasculature in dogs with foreign body obstructions.
Study design: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.
Animals: A total of 24 dogs with an intestinal foreign body obstruction and 30 systemically healthy dogs.
Methods: An SDF videomicroscope imaged the microvasculature at the site of the foreign body. Subjectively viable intestine received an enterotomy whereas nonviable intestine received an enterectomy using a handsewn (4-0 polydioxanone, simple continuous) or a functional end-to-end stapled technique (GIA 60 blue, TA 60 green) was used on an alternating basis. The microvasculature adjacent to the enterectomy was interrogated. Quantitative measures of microvascular health were calculated for each site and compared with healthy dogs.
Results: Microvascular density (mean ± SD) at the site of obstruction (140.84 ± 77.40) was lower than healthy controls (251.72 ± 97.10, p < .01). There was no difference in microvascular parameters (density or perfused boundary region, PBR) between obstructed dogs with subjectively viable and nonviable intestine (p > .14). The density (p = .66) and PBR of microvessels (p = .76) adjacent to the sutured enterectomy or TA green staple line did not differ.
Conclusion: Sidestream dark field videomicroscopy can identify obstructed intestine and quantitate the severity of microvascular compromise. Handsewn and stapled enterectomies equally preserve perfusion.
Clinical significance: Stapled enterectomies do not lead to greater vascular compromise than handsewn enterectomies.
© 2023 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allen DA, Smeak DD, Schertel ER. Prevalence of small intestinal dehiscence and associated clinical factors: a retrospective study of 121 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1992;28:70-76.
-
- Ralphs SC, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Risk factors for leakage following intestinal anastomosis in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223:73-77.
-
- Duell JR, Thieman Mankin KM, Rochat MC. Frequency of dehiscence in hand-sutured and stapled intestinal anastomoses in dogs. Vet Surg. 2016;45:100-103.
-
- Snowdon KA, Smeak DD, Chiang S. Risk factors for dehiscence of stapled functional end-to-end intestinal anastomoses in dogs: 53 cases (2001-2012). Vet Surg. 2016;45:91-99.
-
- DePompeo CM, Bond L, George YE, et al. Intra-abdominal complications following intestinal anastomoses by suture and staple techniques in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:437-443.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
