Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;10(2):157-171.
doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.005. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Myeong Namgung et al. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate mortality from sepsis and septic shock in Korea during the past 10 years, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched six databases for studies on mortality from sepsis and septic shock in adult patients. Primary outcomes were 28- or 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality from sepsis and septic shock. To assess the risk of bias, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk of Bias 2 tools. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022365739).

Results: A total of 61 studies were included. The mortality rates from sepsis and septic shock at 28 or 30 days were 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0%-25.6%; I2=89%) and 27.6% (95% CI, 22.3%-33.5%; I2=98%), respectively, according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. Furthermore, in accordance with the Sepsis-3 criteria, the in-hospital mortality rates were 28.1% (95% CI, 25.2%-31.1%; I2=87%) and 34.3% (95% CI, 27.2%-42.2%; I2=97%), respectively.

Conclusion: The mortality rates from sepsis and septic shock in Korea are high. In the case of septic shock, the in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 30%.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Mortality; Republic of Korea; Sepsis; Septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart for included studies. KMbase, Korean Medical Database; KISS, Korean Studies Information Service System.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot for 28- or 30-day mortality from sepsis using the Sepsis-3 criteria. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Forest plot for in-hospital mortality from sepsis using the Sepsis-3 criteria. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Forest plot for 28- or 30-day mortality from septic shock using the Sepsis-3 criteria. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Forest plot for in-hospital mortality from septic shock using the Sepsis-3 criteria. CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5:4–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP. The surviving sepsis campaign: where have we been and where are we going? Cleve Clin J Med. 2015;82:237–44. - PubMed
    1. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:775–87. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources