Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 1;46(6):231-235.
doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000994. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

ACR-ARS Practice Parameter on Informed Consent Radiation Oncology

Affiliations
Review

ACR-ARS Practice Parameter on Informed Consent Radiation Oncology

Mark D Hurwitz et al. Am J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Consent is a communication process between the patient and a health care provider, in which both parties have the opportunity to ask questions and exchange information relevant to the patient's diagnosis and treatment. The process of informed consent is designed to protect a patient's autonomy in their medical decision-making in the context of an asymmetric relationship with the health care system. A proper consent process assures a patient's individual autonomy, reduces the opportunity for abusive conduct or conflicts of interest, and raises trust levels among participants. This document was developed as an educational tool to facilitate these goals.

Methods: This practice parameter was produced according to the process described under the heading "The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards" on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Committee members were charged with reviewing the prior version of the informed consent practice parameter published in 2017 and recommending additions, modifications, or deletions. The committee met through remote access and subsequently through an online exchange to facilitate the development of the revised document. Focus was given on identifying new considerations and challenges with informed consent given the evolution of the practice of radiation oncology in part driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and other external factors.

Results: A review of the practice parameter published in 2017 confirmed the ongoing relevance of recommendations made at that time. In addition, the evolution of the practice of radiation oncology since the publication of the prior document resulted in the need for new topics to be addressed. These topics include remote consent either through telehealth or telephone and with the patient or their health care proxy.

Conclusions: Informed consent is an essential process in the care of radiation oncology patients. This practice parameter serves as an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in optimizing this process for the benefit of all involved parties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.D.H.: Advisor to Boston Scientific and Neotherma. C.R.G.: American Society Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) Career Development Award to End Breast Cancer NIH/NCI K12 Clinical Scientist Institutional Career Development Program Award. S.S.L.: Elekta AB—Member, Gamma Knife ICON Expert Group (Ended January 1, 2023). W.S.Jr: Carl Zeiss, honoraria, and travel expenses for DSMB service. ACR Radiation Oncology Commission. N.R.S.: Employment relationships with South Florida Proton Therapy Institute and Rakuten-Medical, Inc. (Medical Director). The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest. Consent is a communication process between the patient and a health care provider, in which both parties have the opportunity to ask questions and exchange information relevant to the patient’s diagnosis and treatment. The process of informed consent is designed to protect a patient’s autonomy in their medical decision-making in the context of an asymmetric relationship with the health care system. A proper consent process assures a patient’s individual autonomy, reduces the opportunity for abusive conduct or conflicts of interest, and raises trust levels among participants. This document was developed as an educational tool to facilitate these goals.

References

    1. Richardson LJ. Consent Manual 2010, 37th edn. California Hospital Association; 2010.
    1. Rozovsky FA. Consent to treatment: a practical guide, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Aspen Publishers; 2007.
    1. Schafer C, Herbst M. Ethical aspects of patient information in radiation oncology. An introduction and a review of the literature. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003;179:431–440. - PubMed
    1. American Medical Association. Opinion 8.08—informed consent. Accessed August 24, 2021. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ama-code-medical-ethics-opi...
    1. Anscher MS, Anscher BM. Medical malpractice in the age of technology: how specialty societies can make a difference. Brachytherapy. 2006;5:131–134. - PubMed