Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 11;71(6):1584-1604.
doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2185093. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

Challenges in Arranging to Waive Parental Consent in HIV Prevention Studies of Adolescent Men Who have Sex with Men: The Case of HPTN 078

Robert Klitzman  1 , Robert H Remien  2 , Chris Beyrer  3   4
Affiliations

Challenges in Arranging to Waive Parental Consent in HIV Prevention Studies of Adolescent Men Who have Sex with Men: The Case of HPTN 078

Robert Klitzman et al. J Homosex. .

Abstract

Including adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) in HIV prevention and treatment studies without parental permission is vital, but has often faced barriers. We examine the case of recent Institutional Review Boards (IRB) reviews of an HIV treatment and prevention study that requested waiving parental permission at four United States sites, but received different responses from each institution. IRBs varied in whether and how they weighed parental rights against AMSMs' rights and individual and social benefits, and potential harms (e.g., if a parent disapproves of the adolescents' sexual behavior). One IRB "tabled" the decision to receive advice from the university Office of General Counsel (OGC), despite state laws allowing minors to consent to HIV testing and treatment without parental permission. Another IRB consulted the university's Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), which thought the waiver was inconsistent with state law, which discusses "venereal disease," but not HIV. University attorneys may have competing priorities, however, and thus interpret relevant laws differently. This case raises critical concerns, highlighting needs for advocates for AMSM, researchers, IRBs and others at institutional, governmental, and community levels to educate policymakers, public health departments, IRB chairs, members, and staff, OGCs and CCOs about these issues.

Keywords: Adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM); HIV; IRBs; adolescents; consent; homosexuality; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

    1. Baral SD, Ketende S, Schwartz S, Orazulike I, Ugoh K, Peel SA, Ake J, Blattner W, & Charurat M (2015). Evaluating respondent-driven sampling as an implementation tool for universal coverage of antiretroviral studies among men who have sex with men living with HIV. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 68(2), S107–S103. 10.1097/qai.0000000000000438 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauman LJ, Mellins CA, & Klitzman R (2020). Whether to waive parental permission in HIV prevention research among adolescents: Ethical and legal considerations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(1), 188–201. 10.1177/1073110520917010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boston College Law School’s Juvenile Rights Advocacy Project. (2006). Consent to medical treatment by minors in Massachusetts: A guide for practitioners. Retrieved December 28, 2022, from https://www.mass.gov/doc/consent-tomedical-treatment-by-minors-in-massac...
    1. Brazier M. (2005). Where the law and the ethics conflict? Research Ethics Review, 1(3), 97–100. 10.1177/174701610500100305 - DOI
    1. Brooks RA, Etzel MA, Hinojos E, Henry CL, & Perez M (2005). Preventing HIV among Latino and African American gay and bisexual men in a context of HIV-related stigma, discrimination, and homophobia: Perspectives of providers. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 19(11), 737–744. 10.1089/apc.2005.19.737 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources