Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 May 20;41(15):2815-2826.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01794. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Final Results of a Phase Ib Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Final Results of a Phase Ib Study

David A Sallman et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks cluster of differentiation 47, a don't-eat-me signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Cluster of differentiation 47 blockade by magrolimab promotes macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine, which increases expression of eat-me signals. We report final phase Ib data in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with magrolimab and azacitidine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479).

Patients and methods: Patients with previously untreated Revised International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS received magrolimab intravenously as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg once-weekly or once-every-2-week maintenance dose. Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate.

Results: Ninety-five patients were treated. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk was intermediate/high/very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Fifty-nine (62%) had poor-risk cytogenetics and 25 (26%) had TP53 mutation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), and anemia (52%). Median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.7 g/dL (range, -3.1 to +2.4). CR rate and overall response rate were 33% and 75%, respectively. Median time to response, duration of CR, duration of overall response, and progression-free survival were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with 17.1-month follow-up. In TP53-mutant patients, 40% achieved CR with median OS of 16.3 months. Thirty-four patients (36%) had allogeneic stem-cell transplant with 77% 2-year OS.

Conclusion: Magrolimab + azacitidine was well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with untreated higher-risk MDS, including those with TP53 mutations. A phase III trial of magrolimab/placebo + azacitidine is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881 [ENHANCE]).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Naval G. Daver

Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Agios, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Immunogen, Genentech, Servier, Syndax, Trillium Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Arog, Shattuck Labs

Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Immunogen, Genentech, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, Trillium Therapeutics, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, Glycomimetics

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Hemoglobin changes from baseline over time on treatment with magrolimab + azacitidine in patients with HR-MDS (N = 95). Data shown are median (Q1, Q3) change in blood samples drawn before each magrolimab dose. Analysis includes all patients who received at least one dose of magrolimab. HR-MDS, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Efficacy of magrolimab + azacitidine in patients with HR-MDS (N = 95). Assessments of efficacy were based on bone marrow aspirate and trephine bone marrow biopsy collected every two cycles starting with cycle 3 day 1, then every three cycles starting with cycle 7 day 1. Analyses include all patients who received at least one dose of magrolimab. (A) Best change from baseline in percent of bone marrow blasts for each patient. Bars are labeled by TP53 mutation status; those labeled as missing represent patients with TP53 mutation status unknown. (B) KM curves of PFS for the overall population and by TP53 mutation status. (C) KM curve of OS for the overall population and by TP53 mutation status. (D) KM curve of OS for patients who did and did not undergo allo-HSCT after magrolimab + azacitidine treatment. allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; HR-MDS, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome; KM, Kaplan-Meier; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Swimmer plot of response over time, treatment duration, and next treatment initiation for individual patients treated with magrolimab + azacitidine who achieved a CR. Y-axis indicates TP53-mut status for each patient. Time of first response assessment and results of subsequent response assessments are indicated by vertical lines. Stem-cell transplant is shown by black dots. Blue stars indicate time of next treatment initiation, and blue arrows show patients who were ongoing on magrolimab treatment at the time of data cutoff. CR, complete remission; mCR, marrow CR; mut, mutation; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial remission; Pt, patient; SCT, stem-cell transplantation; SD, stable disease; wt, wild-type.

References

    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. : Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120:2454-2465, 2012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aubrey BJ, Brunner AM: SOHO state of the art and next questions: Treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 22:P869-P877, 2022 - PubMed
    1. Jain AG, Elmariah H: BMT for myelodysplastic syndrome: When and where and how. Front Oncol 11:771614, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, et al. : Biologic assignment trial of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients 50-75 years of age with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 39:3328-3339, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, et al. : Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: A study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 20:2429-2440, 2002 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data