The role of switch maintenance therapy in urothelial cancers
- PMID: 36891217
- PMCID: PMC9986508
- DOI: 10.1177/17562872221147760
The role of switch maintenance therapy in urothelial cancers
Abstract
Maintenance therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial established avelumab, one of several ICIs in use today, as a life-prolonging maintenance therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Platinum-based chemotherapy is most often used in the first-line treatment of mUC, and while response rates approach about 50%, disease control is usually short-lived upon completion of the standard three to six cycles of chemotherapy. Much progress has been made in recent years in the second-line space and beyond with the use of ICIs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in eligible patients at the time of disease progression post-platinum-based chemotherapy. However, many patients with progressive mUC after first-line chemotherapy suffer from rapid progression of disease, treatment toxicity with subsequent lines of therapy, and a limited life expectancy. Until the results of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial were presented in 2020, there were no maintenance strategies proven to be beneficial over best supportive care after disease control is achieved with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, standard of care frontline treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer remains to be four to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab. This review summarizes the current evidence available on maintenance therapies in mUC, as well as several highly anticipated clinical trials that we hope will result in further progress in the management of this aggressive cancer and improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: avelumab; immunotherapy; switch maintenance; urothelial cancer.
© The Author(s), 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.B.A.-C. has served on the Advisory Board and Speakers’ Bureau of EMD Serono/Pfizer and Astellas/SeaGen and AVEO, Immunomedics, Merck. J.B.A.-C. has served on the Speakers’ Bureau of BMS and has served on the Advisory Board of Merck, AZD, and Immunomedics. E.-m.Y., M.M., and R.B. have no conflicts to declare.
References
-
- Miyazaki J, Nishiyama H. Epidemiology of urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2017; 24: 730–734. - PubMed
-
- Cancer of the urinary bladder: cancer stat facts. SEER, https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html (accessed 19 July 2022).
-
- von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3068–3077. - PubMed
-
- Seront E, Machiels JP. Molecular biology and targeted therapies for urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41: 341–353. - PubMed
-
- De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Mead G, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 191–199. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
