Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;49(4):300-307.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201722. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

A prospective, comparative study of clinical outcomes following clinic-based versus self-use of medical abortion

Affiliations

A prospective, comparative study of clinical outcomes following clinic-based versus self-use of medical abortion

Nathalie Kapp et al. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: To determine whether clinical outcomes differ among women accessing a combined medical abortion regimen from a health clinic when compared with those accessing it from a pharmacy.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-inferiority study of participants aged ≥15 years seeking medical abortion from five clinics and five adjacent pharmacy clusters in three provinces of Cambodia. Participants were recruited in-person at the point of purchase (clinic or pharmacy). Follow-up for self-reported pill use, acceptability, and clinical outcomes occurred by telephone at days 10 and 30 after mifepristone administration.

Results: Over 10 months, we enrolled 2083 women with 1847 providing outcome data: 937 from clinics and 910 from pharmacies. Most were early in their pregnancy (mean gestational age of 6.3 and 6.1 weeks, respectively) and almost all took the pills correctly (98% and 96%,). Additional treatment needed to complete the abortion was non-inferior for the pharmacy group (9.3%) compared with the clinic group (12.7%). More from the clinic group received additional care from a provider, such as antibiotics or diagnostics tests, than those from the pharmacy group (11.5% and 3.2%,), and one ectopic pregnancy (pharmacy group) was successfully treated. Most said they felt prepared for what happened after taking the pills (90.9% and 81.3%, respectively, p=0.273).

Conclusions: Self-use of a combined medical abortion product resulted in comparable clinical outcomes as use following a clinical visit, consistent with existing literature on its safety and efficacy. Registration and availability of medical abortion as an over-the-counter product would likely increase women's access to safe abortion.

Keywords: Abortion, Incomplete; Abortion, Therapeutic; Health Policy; Pharmaceutical Services; Reproductive Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the study. MA, medical abortion.

References

    1. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet 2017;390:2372–81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popinchalk A, Sedgh G. Trends in the method and gestational age of abortion in high-income countries. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019;45:95–103. 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganatra B, Tunçalp Ö, Johnston HB, et al. From concept to measurement: operationalizing WHO’s definition of unsafe abortion. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:155. 10.2471/BLT.14.136333 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abubeker FA, Lavelanet A, Rodriguez MI, et al. Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health 2020;20:142. 10.1186/s12905-020-01003-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:12–21. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000897 - DOI - PubMed