Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 10;5(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s42522-022-00076-9.

What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities

Lauren E Van Patter  1 , Julia Linares-Roake  2 , Andrea V Breen  2
Affiliations

What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities

Lauren E Van Patter et al. One Health Outlook. .

Abstract

What does One Health want? Despite its touted interdisciplinarity, to date there has been limited engagement with the social sciences and humanities - in particular with streams of critical social theory that enable a response to this question. In this paper we draw on the critical social sciences to consider how One Health is defined, conceptualized, and positioned, and discuss what we see as vital challenges within One Health that both limit its potential for meaningful change and contribute to a potential for ongoing harm - namely, medicalization, anthropocentrism, and colonial-capitalism. We then advance three areas in the critical social sciences that hold potential for addressing these challenges - feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial approaches. By doing so we seek to encourage a deeper transdisciplinarity within One Health - one that is open to a genuine engagement with insights from critical social theory and a re-orientation towards more creative and radical re-imaginings in the service of wellbeing for diverse peoples, animals, other beings, and the land.

Keywords: Anti-colonial; Critical social sciences; Critical social theory; Feminist care ethics; Multispecies justice; One Health; Posthuman.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Craddock S, Hinchliffe S. One world, one health? Social science engagements with the one health agenda. Soc Sci Med. 2015;129:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michalon J. Accounting for One Health: Insights from the social sciences. Parasite. 2020;27:56. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf M. Is there really such a thing as “one health”? Thinking about a more than human world from the perspective of cultural anthropology. Soc Sci Med. 2015;129:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinchliffe S. More than one world, more than one health: Re-configuring interspecies health. Soc Sci Med. 2015;129:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis A, Sharp J. Rethinking One Health: Emergent human, animal and environmental assemblages. Soc Sci Med. 2020;258:113093. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources