Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 17;9(3):e13815.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13815. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Onion plants (Allium cepa L.) react differently to salinity levels according to the regulation of aquaporins

Affiliations

Onion plants (Allium cepa L.) react differently to salinity levels according to the regulation of aquaporins

Alireza Solouki et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

As salinity is one of the main environmental stresses that reduces the growth and productivity of crops by reducing water uptake and transport, in this work, we associated the physiological tolerance response of onion to increased NaCl concentration (from 25, 50, 75, to 100 mM) with the expression of aquaporins. Measurements of transpiration, gas exchange and nutrients content in leaf, roots and bulb tissues were determined in relation to the expression of PIP2, PIP1, and TIP2 aquaporin genes. The results indicated a significant decrease in growth in leaves, roots and bulbs only when 50 mM NaCl was applied. However, this was not correlated with the rest of the parameters, such as transpiration, number of stomata, osmotic potential, or chlorophyll concentration. In this way, the finding that the decreases in Mn, Zn and B observed in leaves, roots and bulbs at 50 mM NaCl were related to the expression of aquaporins, leaded to propose two phases of responses to salinity depending on level of NaCl. Therefore, the activation of PIP2 at 75 mM, in relation to Zn uptake, is proposed as relevant in the response of onion to high salinity.

Keywords: Allium cepa L.; PIP1; PIP2; Salinity; TIP2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fresh weights of leaves (a) bulbs (b) and roots (c) of onion plants for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM). Each value represents the mean of 6 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Physiological parameters: Relative water contain (a) osmotic potential in leaves (b) and osmotic potential in roots (c) for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM). Each value represents the mean of 6 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Transpiration rate (a) and number of stomata per mm2 (b) for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM). Each value represents the mean of 6 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Chlorophyll A (a), Chlorophyll B (b) and Carotenoid (c) content per gr of leaf fresh weight for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM). Each value represents the mean of 6 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Concentration of macronutrients K, Ca & Na (columns) in leaves, roots & bulbs (rows) for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM) (a–i). Each value represents the mean of 4 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Concentration of micronutrients Mn, Zn & B (columns) in leaves, roots & bulbs (rows) for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM) (a–i). Each value represents the mean of 4 biological replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Relative expression levels of aquaporin genes PIP1, PIP2 and TIP2 (rows) in leaves, roots & bulbs (columns) for the control and the salinity treatments (25, 50, 75 and 100 mM) (a–i). All the analyses were performed using QuantStudio 5 Flex Real-Time qPCR system and transcript levels were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method (relative units). The values are the means ± S.E. of 3–4 biological replicates with 3 technical replicates of each measurement. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and the treatments according to a post hoc Duncan's test.

References

    1. Ashraf M., Harris P. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 2004;166:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024. - DOI
    1. Carvajal M., Cooke D., Clarkson D. Water transport across plant plasma membrane. Plant Growth Regul. 1998;25:89–95.
    1. Munns R., Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Negrao S., Schmockel S., Tester M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 2017;119:1–11. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao S., Zhang Q., Liu M., Zhou H., Ma C., Wang P. Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms22094609. - DOI - PMC - PubMed