Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 17;9(3):e13827.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13827. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Prognostic value of genomic mutations in metastatic prostate cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic value of genomic mutations in metastatic prostate cancer

Honghui Zhu et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) has a poor prognosis, and new treatment strategies are currently being offered for patients in clinical practice, but mPC is still incurable. A considerable proportion of patients with mPC harbor homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations, which may be more sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). We retrospectively included genomic and clinical data from 147 patients with mPC from a single clinical center, with a total of 102 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples and 60 tissue samples. The frequency of genomic mutations was analyzed and compared with that in Western cohorts. Cox analysis was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and prognostic factors related to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after standard systemic therapy for mPC. The most frequently mutated gene in the HRR pathway was CDK12 (18.3%), followed by ATM (13.7%) and BRCA2 (13.0%). The remaining common ones were TP53 (31.3%), PTEN (12.2%), and PIK3CA (11.5%). The frequency of BRCA2 mutation was close to that of the SU2C-PCF cohort (13.3%), but the frequency of CDK12, ATM, and PIK3CA mutations was significantly higher than that in the SU2C-PCF cohort: 4.7%, 7.3%, and 5.3%, respectively. CDK12 mutation were less responsive to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), docetaxel, and PARPi. BRCA2 mutation helps predict PARPi efficacy. Additionally, androgen receptor (AR)-amplified patients do not respond well to ARSIs, and PTEN mutation are associated with poorer docetaxel response. These findings support the genetic profiling of patients with mPC after diagnosis to guide treatment stratification to customize personalized treatment.

Keywords: Metastatic prostate cancer in china; Next generation sequencing; Prognosis; Somatic gene mutation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram depicting the patient groups included in each cohort according to the different treatment modalities.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of somatic gene alterations in mPC compared to the SU2C-PCF cohort.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concordance of somatic mutation counts between ctDNA samples and matched tissues from 30 patients.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Waterfall plot of best PSA response at Week 12, maximum percent change from baseline, for each treatment group. The horizontal dashed line represents a 50% reduction. (a) ARSI group. (b) Docetaxel group. (c) Docetaxel + platinum group. (d) PARPi group. (e) Platinum group. Abbreviations: PSA, prostate specific antigen.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Meaningful associations between genomic alterations and clinical outcomes across treatment groups. (a) AR amplification, BRCA2 mutation were associated with worse PSA responses in ARSI-treated group. (b) CDK12, HRR mutations were associated with worse PSA responses in ARSI-treated group. (c) Docetaxel treatment outcomes are associated with PTEN mutation. (d) PARPi had a high PSA response rate in patients with BRCA2 mutation and a poor response with CDK12 mutation. Abbreviations: AR, androgen receptor; HRR, homologous recombination repair; PARPi, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Genomic alterations and clinical information in different treatment groups lead to different clinical outcomes. (a) ARSI group. (b) Docetaxel group. (c) PARPi group. (d) Platinum group.

References

    1. Sung H., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
    1. Mottet N., et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur. Urol. 2017;71(4):618–629. - PubMed
    1. Cornford P., et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2017;71(4):630–642. - PubMed
    1. Nuhn P., et al. Update on systemic prostate cancer therapies: management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the era of precision oncology. Eur. Urol. 2019;75(1):88–99. - PubMed
    1. Ryan C.J., et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368(2):138–148. - PMC - PubMed