Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 21:13:1081134.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1081134. eCollection 2023.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomogram for predicting tumor grade in endometrial cancer

Affiliations

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomogram for predicting tumor grade in endometrial cancer

Xiaoning Yue et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Tumor grade is associated with the treatment and prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC). The accurate preoperative prediction of the tumor grade is essential for EC risk stratification. Herein, we aimed to assess the performance of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics nomogram for predicting high-grade EC.

Methods: One hundred and forty-three patients with EC who had undergone preoperative pelvic MRI were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training set (n =100) and a validation set (n =43). Radiomic features were extracted based on T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The minimum absolute contraction selection operator (LASSO) was implemented to obtain optimal radiomics features and build the rad-score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the clinical MRI features and build a clinical model. We developed a radiomics nomogram by combining important clinical MRI features and rad-score. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the three models. The clinical net benefit of the nomogram was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI).

Results: In total, 35/143 patients had high-grade EC and 108 had low-grade EC. The areas under the ROC curves of the clinical model, rad-score, and radiomics nomogram were 0.837 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.754-0.920), 0.875 (95% CI: 0.797-0.952), and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.869-0.977) for the training set; 0.857 (95% CI: 0.741-0.973), 0.785 (95% CI: 0.592-0.979), and 0.914 (95% CI: 0.827-0.996) for the validation set, respectively. The radiomics nomogram showed a good net benefit according to the DCA. NRIs were 0.637 (0.214-1.061) and 0.657 (0.079-1.394), and IDIs were 0.115 (0.077-0.306) and 0.053 (0.027-0.357) in the training set and validation set, respectively.

Conclusion: The radiomics nomogram based on multiparametric MRI can predict the tumor grade of EC before surgery and yield a higher performance than that of dilation and curettage.

Keywords: endometrial cancer; histological grade; magnetic resonance imaging; nomogram; radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of included and excluded patients with endometrial cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Workflow of radiomics analysis and model building.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Eleven robust radiomics features and corresponding coefficients for rad-score construction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Nomogram for predicting the tumor grade of endometrial cancer, established based on multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging and patient age.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic curves of the three models predicting high-grade endometrial cancer in the training (A) and validation sets (B). The graphs (C) and (D) show that the calibration curve of nomogram has good calibration ability in both the training and validation sets, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) The clinical decision curve demonstrated that nomogram has higher net benefits than preoperative curettage at a threshold probability of 0–0.47 and > 0.67. The solid blue and orange lines in figures (B) and (C) represent the clinical impact curves of the nomogram and the actual preoperative DC, respectively. The black dashed line represents the postoperative pathological results of patients with endometrial cancer, and the closer the solid line is to the black dashed line, the better the prediction effect.

References

    1. Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza M, Creutzberg C. Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynecol Obstet: Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecology Obstetrics (2021); 155 (Suppl. S1): 45–60. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13866 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C, et al. . Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol (2018) 4(11):1553–68. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, et al. . ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecological Cancer Soc (2021) 31(1):12–39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: Cancer J Clin (2019) 69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bogani G, Dowdy S, Cliby W, Ghezzi F, Rossetti D, Frigerio L, et al. . Management of endometrial cancer: issues and controversies. Eur J Gynaecological Oncol (2016) 37(1):6–12. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources