Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 1;7(Kidney):65-77.
doi: 10.24908/pocus.v7iKidney.15023. eCollection 2022.

Integrative Volume Status Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Integrative Volume Status Assessment

David Kearney et al. POCUS J. .

Abstract

Volume status assessment is a critical but challenging clinical skill and is especially important for the management of patients in the emergency department, intensive care unit, and dialysis unit where accurate intravascular assessment is necessary to guide appropriate fluid management. Assessment of volume status is subjective and can vary from provider to provider, posing clinical dilemmas. Traditional non-invasive methods of volume assessment include assessment of skin turgor, axillary sweat, peripheral edema, pulmonary crackles, orthostatic vital signs, and jugular venous distension. Invasive assessments of volume status include direct measurement of central venous pressure and pulmonary artery pressures. Each of these has their own limitations, challenges, and pitfalls and were often validated based on small cohorts with questionable comparators. In the past 30 years, the increased availability, progressive miniaturization, and falling price of ultrasound devices has made point of care ultrasound (POCUS) widely available. Emerging evidence base and increased uptake across multiple subspecialities has facilitated the adoption of this technology. POCUS is now widely available, relatively inexpensive, free of ionizing radiation, and can help providers make medical decisions with more precision. POCUS is not intended to replace the physical exam, but rather to complement clinical assessment, guiding providers to give thorough and accurate clinical care to their patients. We should be mindful of the nascent literature supporting the use of POCUS and other limitations as uptake increases among providers and be wary not to use POCUS to substitute clinical judgement, but integrate ultrasonographic findings carefully with history and clinical examination.

Keywords: POCUS; hypovolemia; physical examination; ultrasound; volume assessment; volume overload.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This manuscript is original and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The authors do not have any conflicts of interest or financial disclosure.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Internal jugular vein showing paint brush sign (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Inferior vena cava. This is subxiphoid view obtained with a linear probe placed below the xiphoid process (white arrow indicating dilated IVC).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lung US. A) demonstrating B lines (black arrows) and pleural line (white arrow). B) demonstrating A lines (black arrows)
Figure 4
Figure 4. A) Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS). Parasternal long axis view (PLAX) showing different chambers and aorta. B) Focused Cardiac Ultrasound. PLAX view showing pericardial effusion (white arrow).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Schematic of Integrated Volume Assessment (Created with BioRender.com).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Algorithm for Systemic Approach to Volume Assessment: This is an algorithm that we propose will help with systematic approach to integrative volume assessment for diagnosing hypervolemia. Assigning a score system to each of the findings with higher scores to cardiac, lung and vascular ultrasound for volume assessment would be very useful tool to precisely diagnose volume status. Such tool needs to be studied and validated before widespread use. This approach will integrate POCUS to conventional methods and eliminate the shortcomings of individual methods.

References

    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345:1368–1377. - PubMed
    1. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation. JAMA cardiology. 2018;3(4):346–350. - PubMed
    1. Gross C R L R, Woolley A C, Granieri R, Allard K, Webster B. Clinical indicators of dehydration severity in elderly patients. J Emerg Med. 1992;10(3):267–274. - PubMed
    1. P D L Chassagne, Capet C, Ménard J F, Bercoff E. Clinical presentation of hypernatremia in elderly patients: a case control study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(8):1225–1230. - PubMed
    1. McGee S A, Simel D L. The rational clinical examination. Is this patient hypovolemic? JAMA. 1999;281(11):1022–1029. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources