Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;1(1):100003.
doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100003. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

Lessons Learned From a Prospective Observational Study of U.S. Marine Recruits During a Supervised Quarantine, Spring‒Fall 2020

Affiliations

Lessons Learned From a Prospective Observational Study of U.S. Marine Recruits During a Supervised Quarantine, Spring‒Fall 2020

Andrew G Letizia et al. AJPM Focus. 2022 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Errata.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] AJPM Focus. 2023 Jun;2(2):100098. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100098. Epub 2023 Apr 18. AJPM Focus. 2023. PMID: 37091224 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Introduction: Quarantining is commonly used to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. However, questions remain regarding what specific interventions are most effective.

Methods: After a 2-week home quarantine, U.S. Marine Corps recruits underwent a supervised 2-week quarantine at a hotel from August 11 to September 21, 2020. All recruits were assessed for symptoms through oral questioning and had their temperatures checked daily. Study participants answered a written clinical questionnaire and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction shortly after arrival in quarantine and on Days 7 and 14. The results were compared with those of a previously reported Marine-supervised quarantine at a college campus from May until July 2020 utilizing the same study, laboratory, and statistical procedures.

Results: A total of 1,401 of 1,514 eligible recruits (92.5%) enrolled in the study, 93.1% of whom were male. At the time of enrollment, 12 of 1,401 (0.9%) participants were polymerase chain reaction positive for SARS-CoV-2, 9 of 1,376 (0.7%) were positive on Day 7, and 1 of 1,358 (0.1%) was positive on Day 14. Only 12 of 22 (54.5%) participants endorsed any symptoms on a study questionnaire, and none of the participants had an elevated temperature or endorsed symptoms during daily screening for SARS-CoV-2. Participation rate (92%) was much greater than the approximately 58.8% (1,848 of 3,143) rate observed in the previous Marine-supervised college campus quarantine, suggesting the changing attitudes of recruits during the pandemic (p<0.001). Approximately 1% of participants were quantitative polymerase chain reaction positive after self-quarantine in both studies.

Conclusions: Key findings include the shifting attitudes of young adults during the pandemic, the limitations of self-quarantine, and the ineffectiveness of daily temperature and symptom screening to identify SARS-CoV-2‒positive recruits.

Keywords: Quarantine; SARS-CoV-2 modeling; SARS-CoV-2 screening; recruits; temperature screening; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design for SARS-CoV-2 testing during hotel quarantine. Marine Corps recruits entering a strict, supervised 2-week quarantine from August 11, 2020 through September 21, 2020 at a hotel in Georgia were asked to volunteer for CHARM longitudinal study for monitoring the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recruits who were not enrolled in the study were tested by means of qPCR assay, as required by the Marine Corps, after 14 days of quarantine. CHARM, COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Similar articles

References

    1. Du Z, Wang L, Cauchemez S, et al. Risk for transportation of coronavirus disease from Wuhan to other cities in China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):1049–1052. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.200146. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joshi RK, Ray RK, Adhya S, Chauhan VPS, Pani S. Spread of COVID-19 by asymptomatic cases: evidence from military quarantine facilities. BMJ Mil Health. 2021;167(3):217–218. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quach HL, Hoang NT, Nguyen CK, et al. Successful containment of a flight-imported COVID-19 outbreak through extensive contact tracing, systematic testing and mandatory quarantine: lessons from Vietnam. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021;42 doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maner M, LeMasters K, Lao J, et al. COVID-19 in corrections: quarantine of incarcerated people. PLoS One. 2021;16(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257842. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Toorn W, Oh DY, von Kleist M. Working Group on SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics at RKI. COVIDStrategyCalculator: A software to assess testing and quarantine strategies for incoming travelers, contact management, and de-isolation. Patterns (N Y) 2021;2(6) doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100264. - DOI - PMC - PubMed