Intraperitoneally displaced intrauterine device
- PMID: 36896615
Intraperitoneally displaced intrauterine device
Abstract
Intra-abdominal displacement of an intrauterine device (IUD) is a rare but serious complication. This is a case report of a 44-year-old woman who was referred to a surgical department with intermittent abdominal pain. Gynaecological examination and ultrasound failed to identify the patient's IUD. An abdominal CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of the intra-abdominally migrated IUD and the device was extracted by laparoscopy. Surgical removal of the migrating IUD is recommended to prevent long-term complications such as intra-abdominal adhesions, organ perforation, and fistula formation.
Similar articles
-
Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment.Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det074. Epub 2013 Mar 22. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23526304
-
Successful removal of an intrauterine device perforating the uterus and the bladder with the aid of a transurethral nephroscope.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):325-326. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3746-8. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30128747
-
Laparoscopic removal of a perforated intrauterine device from the perirectal fat.JSLS. 2000 Apr-Jun;4(2):159-62. JSLS. 2000. PMID: 10917124 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine devices migrated into the bladder: two case reports and literature review.BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01443-w. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34399735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981. PMID: 6455610 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources