Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China
- PMID: 36897427
- PMCID: PMC10043099
- DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x
Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the economic value of nivolumab versus docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in adults without epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase aberrations in China.
Methods: Partitioned survival models evaluated lifetime costs and benefits of nivolumab versus docetaxel by squamous and non-squamous histologies from a Chinese healthcare payer perspective. Progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death health states were considered over a 20-year time horizon. Clinical data were derived from the CheckMate pivotal Phase III trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01642004, NCT01673867, NCT02613507); patient-level survival data were extrapolated using parametric functions. China-specific health state utilities, healthcare resource utilisation, and unit costs were applied. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty.
Results: Nivolumab resulted in extended survival (1.489 and 1.228 life-years [1.226 and 0.995 discounted]) and quality-adjusted survival benefits (1.034 and 0.833 quality-adjusted life-years) at additional costs of ¥214,353 (US$31,829) and ¥158,993 (US$23,608) versus docetaxel in squamous and non-squamous aNSCLC, respectively. Nivolumab was associated with higher acquisition costs, lower subsequent treatment costs, and lower adverse event management costs than docetaxel in both histologies. Drug acquisition costs, discount rate for outcomes, and average body weight were key model drivers. Stochastic results aligned with the deterministic results.
Conclusions: Nivolumab yielded survival and quality-adjusted survival benefits at incremental cost versus docetaxel in aNSCLC. As a traditional healthcare payer perspective was applied, the true economic benefit of nivolumab may be underestimated as not all treatment benefits and costs of relevance to society were considered.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
S. Hu is a Health Economics Professor employed by the School of Public Health, Fudan University. Z. Tang was an employee of Sino-American Shanghai Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd at the time the work was undertaken. J.P. Harrison, N. Hertel, J.R. Penrod, J.R. May, and A. Juarez-Garcia are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb and report stock ownership in Bristol Myers Squibb. O. Holdgate was an employee of Parexel International at the time the work was undertaken.
Figures
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer today. Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden in 2018. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.
-
- American Cancer Society. What is non-small cell lung cancer? https://www.cancer.org/cancer/non-small-cell-lung-cancer/about/what-is-n.... Accessed 7 Dec 2018.
-
- National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Cancer stat facts: lung and bronchus cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html. Accessed 31 May 2019.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
