Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;17(4):1541-1546.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience

Affiliations

Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience

Silas Nann et al. J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Robot-assisted general surgery has become increasingly common in the Australian public sector since 2003. It provides significant technical advantages compared to laparoscopic surgery. Currently, it is estimated that the learning curve for surgeons starting off with robotic surgery is complete after 15 cases. This is a retrospective case series, following the progress of four surgeons with minimal robotic experience over 5 years. Patients undergoing colorectal procedures and hernia repairs were included. 303 robotic cases were included in this study, 193 colorectal surgeries and 110 hernia repairs. 20.2% of colorectal patients experienced an adverse event and 10.0% of hernia patients had a complication. The learning curve was correlated to the average docking time, and it was found that this was complete after 2 years, or after a minimum of 12 to 15 cases. Patient length of stay decreases as surgeon experience increases. Robotic surgery is a safe approach to colorectal surgery and hernia repairs with some potential benefits in terms of patient outcomes as surgeon experience increases.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; General surgery; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Flynn J, Larach JT, Warrier S, Heriot A. Whither robotic colorectal surgery? ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:1230–1232. doi: 10.1111/ans.16067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larach JT, Flynn J, Kong J, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade. ANZ J Surg n/a: 2021 doi: 10.1111/ans.16554. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Addison P, Agnew JL, Martz J. Robotic colorectal surgery. Robot Surg. 2020;100:337–360. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu X-L, Yan P-J, Yao L, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Surg Innov. 2019;26:57–65. doi: 10.1177/1553350618797822. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de’Angelis N, Abdalla S, Bianchi G,, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: a propensity score match analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2018;28:1334–1345. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0115. - DOI - PubMed