Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):783-794.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial

Simone Biscaglia et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) values ≥0.90 are associated with a low incidence of adverse events.

Objectives: The AQVA (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR) trial aims to test whether a QFR-based virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to a conventional angiography-based PCI at obtaining optimal post-PCI QFR results.

Methods: The AQVA trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 300 patients (356 study vessels) undergoing PCI were randomized 1:1 to receive either QFR-based virtual PCI or angiography-based PCI (standard of care). The primary outcome was the rate of study vessels with a suboptimal post-PCI QFR value, which was defined as <0.90. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, stent length/lesion, and stent number/patient.

Results: Overall, 38 (10.7%) study vessels missed the prespecified optimal post-PCI QFR target. The primary outcome occurred significantly more frequently in the angiography-based group (n = 26, 15.1%) compared with the QFR-based virtual PCI group (n = 12 [6.6%]; absolute difference = 8.5%; relative difference = 57%; P = 0.009). The main cause of a suboptimal result in the angiography-based group is the underestimation of a diseased segment outside the stented one. There were no significant differences among secondary endpoints, although stent length/lesion and stent number/patient were numerically lower in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06 and P = 0.08, respectively), whereas procedure length was higher in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06).

Conclusions: The AQVA trial demonstrated the superiority of QFR-based virtual PCI over angiography-based PCI with regard to post-PCI optimal physiological results. Future larger randomized clinical trials that demonstrate the superiority of this approach in terms of clinical outcomes are warranted. (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR [AQVA]; NCT04664140).

Keywords: angiography-derived fractional flow reserve; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio; virtual percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was an investigator-driven clinical trial conducted by the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara. Dr Biscaglia has received a research grant from Medis, SMT, Siemens, Insight Lifetech, and GE; and has received personal fees from Siemens, Medis, and Insight Lifetech. Dr Tebaldi has received a research grant from Abbott. Dr Campo has received a research grant from Boston Scientific, Medis, SMT, Siemens, Insight Lifetech, and AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data