Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 10;20(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01594-z.

Sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian settings: a matter of life and death

Affiliations

Sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian settings: a matter of life and death

Rose Mary Asong Tazinya et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

It is estimated that approximately 4.3 million sexually active persons worldwide will receive poor and/or limited access to Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) services in their lifetime. Globally, approximately 200 million women and girls still endure female genital cutting, 33,000 child marriages occur daily, and a myriad of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) agenda gaps continue to remain unaddressed. These gaps are particularly pertinent for women and girls in humanitarian settings where SRH conditions including gender-based violence, unsafe abortions, and poor obstetric care are among the leading causes of female morbidity and mortality. Notably, the past decade has featured a record high number of forcibly displaced persons globally since World War II and has led to over 160 million persons requiring humanitarian aid globally, 32 million of whom are women and girls of reproductive age. Inadequate SRH service delivery continues to persist in humanitarian settings, with basic services insufficient or inaccessible, putting women and girls at higher risk for increased morbidity and mortality. This record number of displaced persons and the continued gaps that remain unaddressed pertaining to SRH in humanitarian settings require renewed urgency to create upstream solutions to this complex issue. This commentary discusses the gaps in the holistic management of SRH in humanitarian settings, explores why these gaps persist, and addresses the unique cultural, environmental, and political conditions which contribute to continued SRH service delivery inadequacies and increased morbidity and mortality for women and girls.

Keywords: Fragile settings; Global Health; Humanitarian settings; Reproductive rights; Sexual and reproductive health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sanni Yaya is Editor-in-chief of Reproductive Health.

References

    1. Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, Basu A, Bertrand JT, Blum R, et al. Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission. The Lancet. 2018;391(10140):2642–2692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health TLG. Headway and hindrances for sexual and reproductive health and rights. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(8):e973. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30316-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawson A, Tappis H, Tran NT. Self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian and fragile settings: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07916-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maheen H, Hoban E. Rural women’s experience of living and giving birth in relief camps in Pakistan. PLoS Curr. 2017;9:ecurrents.dis.7285361a16eefbeddacc8599f326a1dd. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dias Amaral B, Sakellariou D. Maternal health in crisis: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators to safe abortion care in humanitarian crises. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021;2:699121. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.699121. - DOI - PMC - PubMed