Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 23;13(5):855.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050855.

A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians

Affiliations
Review

A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians

Carla Maria Irene Quarato et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US interaction with biological systems have been identified: thermal and non-thermal. As a result, thermal and mechanical indexes have been developed to provide a means of assessing the potential for biological effects from exposure to diagnostic US. The main aims of this paper were to describe the models and assumptions used to estimate the "safety" of acoustic outputs and indices and to summarize the current state of knowledge about US-induced effects on living systems deriving from in vitro models and in vivo experiments on animals. This review work has made it possible to highlight the limits associated with the use of the estimated safety values of thermal and mechanical indices relating above all to the use of new US technologies, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) shear wave elastography (SWE). US for diagnostic and research purposes has been officially declared safe, and no harmful biological effects in humans have yet been demonstrated with new imaging modalities; however, physicians should be adequately informed on the potential risks of biological effects. US exposure, according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, should be as low as reasonably possible.

Keywords: biological effects; biological hazard; cavitation; diagnostic imaging; heating; medical practice; radiation force; safety; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Newman P.G., Rozycki G.S. The History of Ultrasound. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1998;78:179–195. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70308-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiernicki C., Karoly W.J. Ultrasound: Biological Effects and Industrial Hygiene Concerns. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 2010;46:488–496. doi: 10.1080/15298668591395229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallo M., Ferrara L., Naviglio D. Application of Ultrasound in Food Science and Technology: A Perspective. Foods. 2018;7:164. doi: 10.3390/foods7100164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chisti Y. Sonobioreactors: Using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:89–93. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00033-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pham T.D., Shrestha R.A., Virkutyte J., Sillanpää M. Recent studies in environmental applications of ultrasoundA paper submitted to the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2009;36:1849–1858. doi: 10.1139/L09-068. - DOI