The Influence of Grape Clone and Yeast Strain on Varietal Thiol Concentrations and Sensory Properties of Graševina Wines
- PMID: 36900502
- PMCID: PMC10000662
- DOI: 10.3390/foods12050985
The Influence of Grape Clone and Yeast Strain on Varietal Thiol Concentrations and Sensory Properties of Graševina Wines
Abstract
Varietal thiol concentration in wine is influenced by numerous factors, of which grape variety and winemaking practices are often highlighted as the most important. Therefore, the aim of this work was to study the effects of grape clone and yeast strain (Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces) on the varietal thiols concentrations and sensory characteristics of Graševina (Vitis vinifera L.) white wines. Two grape clones were evaluated (OB-412 and OB-445) along with three different commercial yeast strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lalvin Sensy and Sauvy, and Metschnikowia pulcherrima Flavia). The results showed that the concentration of varietal thiols in Graševina wines amounted up to a total of 226 ng/L. The clone OB-412 was characterized by its significantly higher concentrations, especially of 3-sulfanylhexanol (3SH) and 3-sulfanylhexyl acetate (3SHA). Moreover, alcoholic fermentation with pure S. cerevisiae Sauvy yeasts generally resulted in higher thiol concentrations, while sequential fermentation involving M. pulcherrima positively affected only the 4-methyl-4-sulfanyl-pentan-2-one (4MSP) concentration. Finally, sensory analysis showed that fermentation with pure S. cerevisiae Sauvy yeast also produced more desirable wines. The results suggest that clonal, and especially yeast strain, selections are important modulators of the aroma and sensory properties of wine.
Keywords: Metschnikowia pulcherrima; Saccharomyces yeasts; clonal selection; varietal aroma; white wine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures


References
-
- Swiegers J., Bartowsky E., Henschke P., Pretorius I. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2005;11:139–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x. - DOI
-
- Prokes K., Baron M., Mlcek J., Jurikova T., Adamkova A., Ercisli S., Sochor J. The Influence of Traditional and Immobilized Yeast on the Amino-Acid Content of Sparkling Wine. Fermentation. 2022;8:36. doi: 10.3390/fermentation8010036. - DOI
-
- Tahmaz H., Soylemezoglu G. Selected phenolics and antioxidant capacities: From Boğazkere (Vitis vinifera L.) grape to pomace and wine. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2022;46:623–631. doi: 10.55730/1300-011X.3031. - DOI
-
- Tominaga T., Murat M.-L., Dubourdieu D. Development of a method for analyzing the volatile thiols involved in the characteristic aroma of wines made from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46:1044–1048. doi: 10.1021/jf970782o. - DOI
-
- Darriet P., Tominaga T., Lavigne V., Boidron J.N., Dubourdieu D. Identification of a powerful aromatic component of Vitis vinifera L. var. Sauvignon wines: 4-mercapto-4-methylpentan-2-one. Flavour Frag. J. 1995;10:385–392. doi: 10.1002/ffj.2730100610. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous