Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 27;11(5):707.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050707.

Patient Information and Consent for Care in the Intensive Care Unit

Affiliations
Review

Patient Information and Consent for Care in the Intensive Care Unit

Jean-Philippe Rigaud et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

In this paper, we review the ethical issues involved in providing information to, and obtaining consent (for treatment and/or research) from patients in the intensive care unit. We first review the ethical obligations of the physician in treating patients, who are by definition, vulnerable, and often unable to assert their autonomy during situations of critical illness. Providing clear and transparent information to the patient about treatment options or research opportunities is an ethical and, in some cases, legal obligation for the physicians, but may be rendered difficult, not to say impossible in the intensive care unit by the patient's health state. In this context, we review the specificities of intensive care with respect to information and consent. We discuss who the right contact person is in the ICU setting, with possible choices including a surrogate decision maker, or a member of the family, in the absence of an officially designated surrogate. We further review the specific considerations relating to the family of critically ill patients, and the amount and type of information that may be given to them without breaching the tenets of medical confidentiality. Finally, we discuss the specific cases of consent to research, and patients who refuse care.

Keywords: consent; ethics; information; intensive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2019.
    1. Perrotin D. Ethique en réanimation. In: Gold F., Choutet P., Burfin E., editors. Reperes et Situations Éthiques en Médecine. Ellipses; Paris, France: 1998. pp. 164–177.
    1. Luce J.M. Ethical principles in critical care. JAMA. 1990;263:696–700. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440050090040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moutel G. Le Consentement dans les Pratiques de Soins et de Recherche: Entre Idéalismes et Réalités Cliniques. L’Harmattan; Paris, France: 2004.
    1. Law 2002-303 Dated 4 March 2002 Regarding Patients’ Rights and Quality of Healthcare. Aug 24, 2011. [(accessed on 28 April 2014)]. Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise. Available online: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000227015.

LinkOut - more resources