Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 27;11(5):709.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050709.

Improving Medical Student Anatomy Knowledge and Confidence for the Breast Surgical Oncology Rotation

Affiliations

Improving Medical Student Anatomy Knowledge and Confidence for the Breast Surgical Oncology Rotation

Chloe Wilder et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The anatomy curriculum has undergone considerable reductions in class time, resulting in decreased student anatomical knowledge retention and confidence during their surgical rotations. To counter this deficit in anatomy knowledge, a clinical anatomy mentorship program (CAMP) was developed by fourth-year medical student leaders and staff mentors in a near-peer teaching fashion prior to the surgical clerkship. This study analyzed the impact this program had on third-year medical students (MS3s) self-assessed anatomical knowledge and confidence in the operating room on the Breast Surgical Oncology rotation after this near-peer program.

Methods: A single-center prospective survey study was performed at an academic medical center. Pre- and post-program surveys were administered to all students who participated in the CAMP and rotated on the breast surgical oncology (BSO) service during the surgery clerkship rotation. A control group of individuals who did not rotate on the CAMP was established, and this group was administered a retrospective survey. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess surgical anatomy knowledge, confidence in the operating room, and comfort in assisting in the operating room. Control group versus post-CAMP intervention group and pre- versus post-CAMP intervention groups survey results were compared using the Student's t-test with a p-value of <0.05 statistically significant.

Results: All CAMP students rated their surgical anatomy knowledge (p < 0.01), confidence in the operating room (p < 0.01), and comfort in assisting in the operating room (p < 0.01) as greater than those who did not participate in the program. Additionally, the program improved the ability of third-year medical students to prepare for operating room cases going into their third-year breast surgical oncology clerkship (p < 0.03).

Conclusions: This near-peer surgical education model appears to be an effective way to prepare third-year medical students for the breast surgical oncology rotation during the surgery clerkship by improving anatomic knowledge and student confidence. The program can serve as a template for medical students, surgical clerkship directors, and other faculty interested in efficiently expanding surgical anatomy at their institution.

Keywords: anatomy; breast surgery; dissection; medical education; surgery education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of MS3 responses to the survey items, including the control group and intervention group pre- and post-CAMP. The data is averaged.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survey for the control group administered to those who had completed the BSO clerkship but never participated in the CAMP. Responses were given on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from very poor to excellent.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre-CAMP survey to be taken by the intervention group before the CAMP teaching session. Responses were given on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from very poor to excellent.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-CAMP survey to be taken by the intervention group after the CAMP teaching session. All responses were given on a Likert scale ranging from very poor to excellent (Q1–Q4) or strongly disagree to strongly agree (Q5–Q8).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drake R.L., McBride J.M., Lachman N., Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009;2:253–259. doi: 10.1002/ase.117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drake R.L. A retrospective and prospective look at medical education in the United States: Trends shaping anatomical sciences education. J. Anat. 2014;224:256–260. doi: 10.1111/joa.12054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardeen C.R. Report of the sub-committee on anatomy to the council on medical education of the American medical association. Anat. Rec. 1909;3:415–439. doi: 10.1002/ar.1090030705. - DOI
    1. Lee E., Jr. The Education of American Physicians: Historical Essays. JAMA. 1980;244:2354–2355. doi: 10.1001/jama.1980.03310200078039. - DOI
    1. Yiou R., Goodenough D. Applying problem-based learning to the teaching of anatomy: The example of Harvard Medical School. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2006;28:189–194. doi: 10.1007/s00276-005-0062-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources