Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 3;24(5):4920.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24054920.

The Cellular Response to Complex DNA Damage Induced by Ionising Radiation

Affiliations
Review

The Cellular Response to Complex DNA Damage Induced by Ionising Radiation

Beth Wilkinson et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy (ionising radiation; IR) is utilised in the treatment of ~50% of all human cancers, and where the therapeutic effect is largely achieved through DNA damage induction. In particular, complex DNA damage (CDD) containing two or more lesions within one to two helical turns of the DNA is a signature of IR and contributes significantly to the cell killing effects due to the difficult nature of its repair by the cellular DNA repair machinery. The levels and complexity of CDD increase with increasing ionisation density (linear energy transfer, LET) of the IR, such that photon (X-ray) radiotherapy is deemed low-LET whereas some particle ions (such as carbon ions) are high-LET radiotherapy. Despite this knowledge, there are challenges in the detection and quantitative measurement of IR-induced CDD in cells and tissues. Furthermore, there are biological uncertainties with the specific DNA repair proteins and pathways, including components of DNA single and double strand break mechanisms, that are engaged in CDD repair, which very much depends on the radiation type and associated LET. However, there are promising signs that advancements are being made in these areas and which will enhance our understanding of the cellular response to CDD induced by IR. There is also evidence that targeting CDD repair, particularly through inhibitors against selected DNA repair enzymes, can exacerbate the impact of higher LET, which could be explored further in a translational context.

Keywords: DNA repair; carbon ions; complex DNA damage; ionising radiation; linear energy transfer; proton beam therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of tissue penetrance relative to dose of X-rays, PBT and CIRT. (A) Tissue-depth-relative dose distribution of X-rays, and pristine proton and carbon ion beams, along with the variation of dose averaged LET for protons varying from ~1 keV/μm to ~17 keV/μm (the LET of carbon ions follows a similar trend, reaching a maximum of ~300–400 keV/μm). (B) The use of multiple pristine proton beams of different energies to give a produce a SOBP that generates a relatively uniform dose distribution across a tumour volume. (C) The use of multiple carbon ion beams to produce a SOBP, but taking into account the calculated RBE and varying the physical dose to give a relatively uniform biological dose across the tumour.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cellular response to DNA damage by ionising radiation. (A) Oxidative DNA base damage, SSBs and abasic (AP) sites are the main types of lesions formed by low-LET radiation, and which are repaired via the BER pathway. In its simplest form, BER is initiated by a damage-specific DNA glycosylase that excises the base damage, the DNA backbone is incised by APE1, the residual 5′-deoxyribosephosphate (dRP) is removed and the single nucleotide gap is filled by Pol β. The SSB remaining is then ligated by the XRCC1-Lig IIIα complex. DSBs created in G0/G1 of the cell cycle are predominantly repaired by two mechanisms. (B) In cNHEJ, Ku70/80 binds to the DNA ends, along with DNA-PKcs and XRCC4-Lig IV to promote DNA ligation. (C) In aNHEJ, the MRN complex resects the DNA ends which are then bound by PARP-1, and ligation is performed by XRCC1-Lig IIIα or Lig I. (D) During S and G2 phases, DSBs can also be repaired by HR which uses a sister chromatid to ensure accurate repair. The MRN complex performs DNA end resection, RAD51 and RPA bind to the single stranded DNA overhangs, followed by strand invasion of the sister chromatid. DNA synthesis, followed by branch migration and Holliday junction resolving is then enabled by RAD52/RAD54. CDD, predominantly generated by high LET radiation, is thought to undergo repair by a combination of these repair pathways, dependent largely on the composition of the damage within the CDD site.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Delaney G., Jacob S., Featherstone C., Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: Estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005;104:1129–1137. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hill M.A. Radiation Track Structure: How the Spatial Distribution of Energy Deposition Drives Biological Response. Clin. Oncol. 2020;32:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitti E.T., Parsons J.L. The Radiobiological Effects of Proton Beam Therapy: Impact on DNA Damage and Repair. Cancers. 2019;11:946. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070946. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durante M., Loeffler J.S. Charged particles in radiation oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2010;7:37–43. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.183. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources