Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 27;13(5):892.
doi: 10.3390/nano13050892.

Harmonic-Gaussian Symmetric and Asymmetric Double Quantum Wells: Magnetic Field Effects

Affiliations

Harmonic-Gaussian Symmetric and Asymmetric Double Quantum Wells: Magnetic Field Effects

Esin Kasapoglu et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

In this study, we considered the linear and non-linear optical properties of an electron in both symmetrical and asymmetrical double quantum wells, which consist of the sum of an internal Gaussian barrier and a harmonic potential under an applied magnetic field. Calculations are in the effective mass and parabolic band approximations. We have used the diagonalization method to find eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the electron confined within the symmetric and asymmetric double well formed by the sum of a parabolic and Gaussian potential. A two-level approach is used in the density matrix expansion to calculate the linear and third-order non-linear optical absorption and refractive index coefficients. The potential model proposed in this study is useful for simulating and manipulating the optical and electronic properties of symmetric and asymmetric double quantum heterostructures, such as double quantum wells and double quantum dots, with controllable coupling and subjected to externally applied magnetic fields.

Keywords: double quantum well; harmonic-Gaussian potential; magnetic field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Harmonic-Gaussian DQW confinement potential profile for a constant value of k=20 nm versus the z-growth direction coordinate. Harmonic-Gaussian symmetric DQW, solid (dashed) lines are for A2=2.0 (A2=4.0) and black (red) lines A1=0.2 (A1=0.5) (a). For z0=0.15, A1=0.5, and A2=2.0 harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW confinement profile and squared wave functions corresponding to the first six energy levels (b). For different z0-values and some values of the structure parameters, the harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW profile (c), and harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW confinement profile and squared wave-functions corresponding to the first six energy levels for the constant values of A2 and z0 but two different values of the parameter-A1 (d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
For k=20nm and z0=0, the variation of the energies corresponding to the first six lower-lying levels of a confined electron within Harmonic-Gaussian symmetric DQW as a function of the A2-parameter: A1=0.2 (a) and A1=0.5 (b). Solid (dashed) lines are for B=0 (B=15T).
Figure 3
Figure 3
For A2=2.0, the variation of the energies that corresponds to the first six lower-lying levels of a confined electron within Harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW as a function of the z0-parameter. Solid (dashed) lines are for A1=0.2 (A1=0.5). Results are for B=0 (a) and B=15T (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results are as in Figure 3, but for A2=4.0.
Figure 5
Figure 5
For some transitions between the energy levels in harmonic-Gaussian symmetric DQW (z0=0) with A1=0.5, the variation of total absorption coefficients as a function of the incident photon energy (a) and the variation of total refractive index as a function of the incident photon energy (b). Here, black (red) lines are for A2=2.0 (A2=4.0), according to parameter-A2. The variation of the energy difference between related levels (c) and the variation of reduced dipole matrix element (d), where black/red lines are for (2–3)/(2–4) transitions. Solid (dashed) lines are for B=0 (B=15T).
Figure 6
Figure 6
For some transitions between the energy levels in harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW with z0=0.10, A1=0.2, and A2=2.0, the variation of total absorption coefficients as a function of the incident photon energy (a), the variation of total refractive index as a function of the incident photon energy (b). According to the parameter-A2, the variation of the energy difference between related levels (c) and the variation of reduced dipole matrix element (d), where black/red lines are for (1–3)/(2–4) transitions. Solid (dashed) lines are for B=0 (B=15T).
Figure 7
Figure 7
For some transitions between the energy levels in Harmonic-Gaussian asymmetric DQW with z0=0.25, A1=0.2, and A2=2.0, the variation of total absorption coefficients as a function of the incident photon energy (a) and the variation of total refractive index as a function of the incident photon energy (b). Solid (dashed) lines are for B=0 (B=15T).
Figure 8
Figure 8
The ground and the first excited states wave functions for a confined electron in rectangular shaped (a) and harmonic-Gaussian (b) symmetric double quantum wells. The corresponding energies are also depicted.

References

    1. Morse P.M. Diatomic molecules according to the wave machanics. II. Vibrational levels. Phys. Rev. 1929;34:57–64. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.34.57. - DOI
    1. Rong Z., Kjaergaard H.G., Sage M.L. Comparison of the Morse and Deng-Fan potentials for X − H bonds in small molecules. Mol. Phys. 2003;101:2285–2294. doi: 10.1080/0026897031000137706. - DOI
    1. Jia C.S., Diao Y.F., Liu X.J., Wang P.Q., Liu J.Y., Zhang G.D. Equivalence of the Wei potential model and Tietz potential model for diatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2012;137:014101. doi: 10.1063/1.4731340. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang P.Q., Zhang L.H., Jia C.S., Liu J.Y. Equivalence of the three empirical potential energy models for diatomic molecules. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 2012;274:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jms.2012.03.005. - DOI
    1. Wang P.Q., Liu J.Y., Zhang L.H., Cao S.Y., Jia C.S. Improved expressions for the Schiöberg potential energy models for diatomic molecules. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 2012;278:23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jms.2012.07.001. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources