Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;15(5):1259.
doi: 10.3390/polym15051259.

Imidazolium Salts for Candida spp. Antibiofilm High-Density Polyethylene-Based Biomaterials

Affiliations

Imidazolium Salts for Candida spp. Antibiofilm High-Density Polyethylene-Based Biomaterials

Clarissa Martins Leal Schrekker et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

The species of Candida present good capability to form fungal biofilms on polymeric surfaces and are related to several human diseases since many of the employed medical devices are designed using polymers, especially high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Herein, HDPE films containing 0; 0.125; 0.250 or 0.500 wt% of 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (C16MImCl) or its analog 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium methanesulfonate (C16MImMeS) were obtained by melt blending and posteriorly mechanically pressurized into films. This approach resulted in more flexible and less brittle films, which impeded the Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis biofilm formation on their surfaces. The employed imidazolium salt (IS) concentrations did not present any significant cytotoxic effect, and the good cell adhesion/proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells on the HDPE-IS films indicated good biocompatibility. These outcomes combined with the absence of microscopic lesions in pig skin after contact with HDPE-IS films demonstrated their potential as biomaterials for the development of effective medical device tools that reduce the risk of fungal infections.

Keywords: biocompatibility; histopathological evaluation; human mesenchymal stem cells; ionic liquid; melt blending.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ISs C16MImCl and C16MImMeS applied in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM micrographs of (A) HDPE, (B) HDPE.Cl.0500, and (C) HDPE.MeS.0500 (scale bar = 1 μm).
Figure 3
Figure 3
AFM images of HDPE, HDPE.Cl.0500, and HDPE.MeS.0500 (Ra = arithmetic mean roughness).
Figure 4
Figure 4
XRD diffractograms (a.u. = arbitrary units) within the 2θ range of (A) 15–25°, HDPE (black line), HDPE.Cl.0125 (red line), HDPE.Cl.0250 (blue line), and HDPE.Cl.0500 (green line) and (B) HDPE (black line), HDPE.MeS.0125 (red line), HDPE.MeS.0250 (blue line), and HDPE.MeS.0500 (green line).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Water contact angles for HDPE films related to the IS content: HDPE (blue ▼), HDPE.Cl (black ◼), and HDPE.MeS (red ⬤).
Figure 6
Figure 6
In vitro minor antibiofilm concentration assay: impediment percentage for HDPE.Cl.0125 (blue bars), HDPE.Cl.0250 (red bars), and HDPE.Cl.0500 (green bars).
Figure 7
Figure 7
In vitro minor antibiofilm concentration assay: impediment percentage for HDPE.MeS.0125 (blue bars), HDPE.MeS.0250 (red bars), and HDPE.MeS.0500 (green bars).
Figure 8
Figure 8
SEM micrographs of (A) HDPE (scale bar = 100 μm), (B) HDPE (scale bar = 100 μm), (C) HDPE (scale bar = 10 μm), (D) HDPE (scale bar = 2 μm), (E) HDPE.Cl.0500 (scale bar = 100 μm), (F) HDPE.Cl.0500 (scale bar = 2 μm), (G) HDPE.MeS.0500 (scale bar = 100 μm) and (H) HDPE.MeS.0500 (scale bar = 2 μm), after undergoing biofilm growth conditions.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Confocal micrographs of hMSC grown on (A) HDPE, (B) HDPE.Cl.0125, (C) HDPE.Cl.0250, (D) HDPE.Cl.0500, (E) HDPE.MeS.0125, (F) HDPE.MeS.0250, and (G) HDPE.MeS.0500 (scale bar = 100 μm).
Figure 10
Figure 10
(A) hMSC adhesion after 48 h of incubation time and (B) hMSC proliferation at 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days of culture time.

References

    1. Dias A.S., Miranda I.M., Branco J., Soares M.M., Vaz C.P., Rodrigues A.G. Adhesion, Biofilm Formation, Cell Surface hydrophobicity, and Antifungal Planktonic Susceptibility: Relationship among Candida spp. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox E.P., Bui C.K., Nett J.E., Hartooni N., Mui M.C., Andes D.R., Nobile C.J., Johnson A.D. An Expanded Regulatory Network Temporally Controls Candida albicans Biofilm Formation. Mol. Microbiol. 2015;96:1226–1239. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oncu S. Optimal Dosage and Dwell Time of Ethanol Lock Therapy on Catheters Infected with Candida species. Clin. Nutr. 2014;33:360–362. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coad B.R., Kidd S.E., Ellis D.H., Griesser H.J. Biomaterials Surfaces Capable of Resisting Fungal Attachment and Biofilm Formation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32:296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu R., Chen X., Falk S.P., Masters K.S., Weisblum B., Gellman S.H. Nylon-3 Polymers Active Against Drug-Resistant Candida albicans Biofilms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:2183–2186. doi: 10.1021/ja512567y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources