How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
- PMID: 36905504
- PMCID: PMC10156787
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3
How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
Abstract
Introductions: Revision surgery because of weight recurrence is performed in 2.5-33% of primary vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and gastric band (GB) cases. These cases qualify for revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2008 to 2019. A stratification analysis and multivariate logistic regression for prediction modeling compared the possibility of sufficient % excess weight loss (%EWL) ≥ 50 or insufficient %EWL < 50 between three different RRYGB procedures, with primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB) as the control during 2 years of follow-up. A narrative review was conducted to test the presence of prediction models in the literature and their internal and external validity.
Results: A total of 558 patients underwent PRYGB, and 338 underwent RRYGB after VBG, LSG, and GB, and completed 2 years of follow-up. Overall, 32.2% of patients after RRYGB had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to 71.3% after PRYGB (p ≤ 0.001). The total %EWL after the revision surgeries for VBG, LSG, and GB was 68.5%, 74.2%, and 64.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). After correcting for confounding factors, the baseline odds ratio (OR) or sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after PRYGB, LSG, VBG, and GB was 2.4, 1.45, 0.29, and 0.32, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Age was the only significant variable in the prediction model (p = 0.0016). It was impossible to develop a validated model after revision surgery because of the differences between stratification and the prediction model. The narrative review showed only 10.2% presence of validation in the prediction models, and 52.5% had external validation.
Conclusion: Overall, 32.2% of all patients after revisional surgery had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to PRYGB. LSG had the best outcome in the revisional surgery group in the sufficient %EWL group and the best outcome in the insufficient %EWL group. The skewness between the prediction model and stratification resulted in a partially non-functional prediction model.
Keywords: Excess weight loss; Gastric band; Prediction model; Revision surgery; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy; Stratification; Vertical banded gastroplasty.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of 5-Year Follow-up Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypasses After Open Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: an Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.Obes Surg. 2022 Sep;32(9):3023-3033. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06189-4. Epub 2022 Jul 7. Obes Surg. 2022. PMID: 35796945 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty.Obes Surg. 2009 Sep;19(9):1216-20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9903-x. Epub 2009 Jun 27. Obes Surg. 2009. PMID: 19562420
-
Propensity score matching analysis comparing outcomes between primary and revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective record-based cohort study.Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1303-1315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09675-z. Epub 2022 Oct 5. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36197519 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Outcomes of Conversion of Failed Gastric Banding to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Meta-Analysis.Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3538-8. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30293135
-
Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32151750
Cited by
-
Predicting Inadequate Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: Derivation and Validation of a Four Factor Model.Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):2991-2998. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07383-2. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38981957
-
The Relationship between Depressive Symptoms, Quality of Life and miRNAs 8 Years after Bariatric Surgery.Nutrients. 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4109. doi: 10.3390/nu15194109. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37836393 Free PMC article.
-
Revisional One-Step Bariatric Surgical Techniques After Unsuccessful Laparoscopic Gastric Band: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up.Obes Surg. 2024 Mar;34(3):814-829. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07039-7. Epub 2024 Jan 17. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38231451 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials