Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 24:10:1134092.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1134092. eCollection 2023.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product improves robustness of equine gut microbiome upon stress

Affiliations

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product improves robustness of equine gut microbiome upon stress

Erika Ganda et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nutritional and environmental stressors can disturb the gut microbiome of horses which may ultimately decrease their health and performance. We hypothesized that supplementation with a yeast-derived postbiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product-SCFP) would benefit horses undergoing an established model of stress due to prolonged transportation.

Methods: Quarter horses (n = 20) were blocked based on sex, age (22 ± 3 mo) and body weight (439 ± 3 kg) and randomized to receive either a basal diet of 60% hay and 40% concentrate (CON) or the basal diet supplemented with 21 g/d Diamond V TruEquine C (SCFP; Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) for 60 days. On day 57, horses were tethered with their heads elevated 35cm above wither height for 12 h to induce mild upper respiratory tract inflammation. Fecal samples were collected at days 0, 28, and 56 before induction of stress, and at 0, 12, 24, and 72 h post-stress and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun metagenomics. Within sample (alpha) diversity was evaluated by fitting a linear model and between sample (beta) diversity was tested with permutational ANOVA.

Results: The SCFP stabilized alpha diversity across all time points, whereas CON horses had more fluctuation (P < 0.05) at 12, 24, and 72 h post-challenge compared to d 56. A significant difference between CON and SCFP was observed at 0 and 12 h. There was no difference in beta-diversity between SCFP and CON on d 56.

Discussion: Taken together, these observations led us to conclude that treatment with SCFP resulted in more robust and stable microbial profiles in horses after stress challenge.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP); equine; horse; microbiome; postbiotic; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AC, MS, BK, SN, and EK were employed by the company Cargill Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study overview. Young and clinically healthy horses were paired by age and sex and randomly assigned into Control (n = 10) or Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP; n = 10). Horses received diets for 60 days. On day 57, horses were subjected to a previously established stress protocol to induce mild upper respiratory tract inflammation that mimicked long-distance transportation. Samples were collected on days 0, 28, and 56 before stress and at 0, 12, 24, and 72 h post-stress.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alpha diversity comparisons. Shannon diversity metrics were analyzed with a linear model which included horse as a random effect, treatment, timepoint, and their interactions. Raw means and standard deviations are shown in the plot. Blue diamonds represent SCFP, and gray circles represent Control. Transparent lines represent the hypothetical trajectory of diversity. Dashed horizontal lines represent within-group pairwise significant differences at the 0.05 level after Bonferroni multiple comparison adjustment. Asterisks indicate timepoints in which SCFP significantly differs from Control **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Beta diversity comparisons. Aitchison distances were analyzed with permutational ANOVA (PERMANOVA) model which included treatment, timepoint, and their interactions. Plots depict principal component analysis of Aitchison distances with CLR transformed data.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Stress challenge results in different microbial profiles in Control and SCFP treated horses. (A) Heatmap of centered log-ratio relative abundance of bacterial species detected in fecal samples of horses. (B) Pie charts represent the presence of samples across different clusters for Control and SCFP groups across time. Species cluster A contains species that drastically increase in relative abundance upon stress challenge, whereas species cluster B is comprised of species which decrease after stress challenge.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Differential abundances. The effect size (log2-fold change) is shown for each species, and only significantly different species are shown in each plot with their correspondent confidence interval. Statistical models included relative abundance as the dependent variable, horse as a random effect, treatment, timepoint, and their interactions as independent variables. Multiple hypothesis testing correction was performed with Benjamini Hochberg False Discovery Rate method. A negative fold change indicates an increase in relative abundance in SCFP compared to Control, and a positive fold indicates a decrease in relative abundance in SCFP compared to Control. (A) Differentially abundant species before stress. (B) Differentially abundant species after stress.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Functional potential is differentially impacted by treatment and stress in SCFP and Control horses. (A) Heatmap of centered log-ratio relative abundance of carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZy) families detected in fecal samples of horses. (B) Pie charts represent the presence of samples across different clusters for Control and SCFP groups across time. AA, Auxiliary Activity Family; CBM, Carbohydrate-Binding Module Family; CE, Carbohydrate Esterase Family; GH, Glycoside Hydrolase Family; GT, Glycosyl Transferase Family; PL, Polysaccharide Lyase Family.

References

    1. Dini-Andreote F, van Elsas JD, Olff H, Salles JF. Dispersal-competition tradeoff in microbiomes in the quest for land colonization. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:6. 10.1038/s41598-018-27783-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forsberg KJ, Reyes A, Wang B, Selleck EM, Sommer MOA, Dantas G. The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens. Science. (2012) 337:1107–11. 10.1126/science.1220761 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung H, Long X, Ni Y, Qian L, Nychas E, Siliceo SL, et al. . Risk assessment with gut microbiome and metabolite markers in NAFLD development. Sci Transl Med. (2022) 14:855. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abk0855 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper L, Gou YK, Nagy A, et al. . The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2004) 101:15718–23. 10.1073/pnas.0407076101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobson A, Lam L, Rajendram M, Tamburini F, Honeycutt J, Pham T, et al. . A gut commensal-produced metabolite mediates colonization resistance to salmonella infection. Cell Host Microbe. (2018) 24:296–307 e7. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.07.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources