Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State France and co-rapporteur Member State Slovenia for the pesticide active substance sulfur and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfur as a fungicide and acaricide on grapevine and cereals (wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.

Keywords: MRL review; fungicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment; sulfur.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) , 2017. Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria; Guidance to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures. Version 5.0 July 2017. Reference: ECHA‐17‐G‐21‐EN; ISBN: 978‐92‐9020‐050‐5. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-clp
    1. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) , 2022. Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of sulfur. CLH‐O‐0000007107‐77‐01/F. Adopted 18 March 2022. Available online: www.echa.europa.eu
    1. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) and EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) with the technical support of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) , Andersson N, Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Grignard E, Kienzler A, Lepper P, Lostia AM, Munn S, Parra Morte JM, Pellizzato F, Tarazona J, Terron A and Van der Linden S, 2018. Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009. EFSA Journal 2018;16(6):5311, 135 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. ECHA‐18‐G‐01‐EN. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2008a. Opinion on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. EFSA Journal 2008;6(1):622, 32 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.622 - DOI
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2008b. Conclusion on pesticide peer review regarding the risk assessment of the active substance sulfur. EFSA Journal 2008;6(12):221, 70 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.221r - DOI

LinkOut - more resources