PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
- PMID: 36908841
- PMCID: PMC9538709
- DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1279
PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.
© 2022 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration.
References
-
- Altemeyer, B. , & Hunsberger, B. E. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5 - DOI
-
- Andrews, D. A. , & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.
-
- Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L. , Higgins, J. , & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta‐analysis. Wiley.
-
- Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L. , Higgins, J. , & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive meta‐analysis (Version 3.3.070) [Computer software]. Biostat. https://www.meta-analysis.com/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources